Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug;8(4):728–736. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.24

Table 2. Demographic, tumor and treatment characteristics of patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic disease treated with gemcitabine and capecitabine (gem-cap) as stratified by adjuvant versus systemic therapy.

Characteristic Systemic, n (%) Adjuvant, n (%) Overall, n (%)
Overall (n) 18 (42.9) 24 (57.1) 42 (100.0)
Age (mean/Std) 69.6/9.5 60.1/8.23 64.3/9.9
Gender
   Male 7 (38.9) 8 (33.3) 15 (35.7)
   Female 11 (61.1) 16 (66.7) 27 (64.3)
ECOG
   0 14 (77.8) 17 (70.8) 31 (73.8)
   1 4 (22.2) 7 (29.2) 11 (26.2)
ASA
   1 4 (22.2) 7 (29.2) 11 (26.2)
   2 10 (55.6) 14 (58.3) 24 (57.1)
   3 4 (22.2) 3 (12.5) 7 (16.7)
CA19-9 serum level, mean/Std (units/mL) 564.4/1,380.2 535.7/1,007.5 549.0/1,179.1
Total bilirubin serum level, mean/Std (µmol/L) 3.5/5.4 2.8/4.2 3.1/4.7
Type of cancer
   IHCC 12 (66.7) 4 (16.7) 16 (38.1)
   EHCC 2 (11.1) 9 (37.5) 11 (26.2)
   GBC 4 (22.2) 11 (45.8) 15 (35.7)
Grade
   Grade I/II 16 (66.7) 22 (51.2)
   Grade III/IV 8 (33.3) 14 (32.6)
Path stage
   I 1 (4.2)
   II 10 (41.7)
   III 13 (54.1)
Type of surgery
   Cholecystectomy 9 (37.5)
   Hepatectomy 8 (33.3)
   Whipple 7 (29.2)
Adjuvant radiation
   No 11 (45.8)
   Yes 13 (54.2)
Margins
   Negative 16 (66.7)
   Positive 8 (33.3)
Number lymph nodes positive (mean/Std) 0.76/0.90
Number lymph nodes examined (mean/Std) 9.83/8.89
Number gem-cap cycles (mean/Std) 6.35/2.17

gem-cap, gemcitabine and capecitabine; Std, standard deviation.