Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;8:645. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00645

Table 2.

Features of different model formalisms analyzed.

Modeling framework Realism Time Scalability Computational cost Complexity Data usage Examples
ABM Phenomenological Continuous Large High High Low Spatial simulation of cell-2-cell interaction and movement in a lung alveolus during infection
Boolean Phenomenological Discrete Medium Low Low Medium Analysis and simulation of the large regulatory network triggered in macrophages after bacteria detection
ODE Mechanistic Continuous Small High Medium High Analysis of fine-tuning of NFkB signaling activation in lung epithelial cells after infection
Stochastic Mechanistic Continuous Small High High High Simulation of dynamics of few bacteria initiating infection in a lung alveolus
Fuzzy Logic Phenomenological Discrete Medium Medium Low Medium Simulation of lung epithelial cell phenotypes with uncertain uncomplete information of activators

Realism: How close from the real biological mechanism is the representation given by the model; time: Whether the model handle the time as a discrete or continuous variable; scalability: Number of compounds the model can on average handle (small: up to 20 compounds, medium: 20–100, large 100–1,000; computational cost: Time and computational resources demanded for model simulation and analysis; complexity of the models in terms of their structure; data usage: Whether the construction of the model requires low, medium or large amounts of quantitative experimental data for its characterization; examples: Possible applications for each formalism in the context of bacterial lung infection.