Table 2.
Features of different model formalisms analyzed.
| Modeling framework | Realism | Time | Scalability | Computational cost | Complexity | Data usage | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | Phenomenological | Continuous | Large | High | High | Low | Spatial simulation of cell-2-cell interaction and movement in a lung alveolus during infection |
| Boolean | Phenomenological | Discrete | Medium | Low | Low | Medium | Analysis and simulation of the large regulatory network triggered in macrophages after bacteria detection |
| ODE | Mechanistic | Continuous | Small | High | Medium | High | Analysis of fine-tuning of NFkB signaling activation in lung epithelial cells after infection |
| Stochastic | Mechanistic | Continuous | Small | High | High | High | Simulation of dynamics of few bacteria initiating infection in a lung alveolus |
| Fuzzy Logic | Phenomenological | Discrete | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium | Simulation of lung epithelial cell phenotypes with uncertain uncomplete information of activators |
Realism: How close from the real biological mechanism is the representation given by the model; time: Whether the model handle the time as a discrete or continuous variable; scalability: Number of compounds the model can on average handle (small: up to 20 compounds, medium: 20–100, large 100–1,000; computational cost: Time and computational resources demanded for model simulation and analysis; complexity of the models in terms of their structure; data usage: Whether the construction of the model requires low, medium or large amounts of quantitative experimental data for its characterization; examples: Possible applications for each formalism in the context of bacterial lung infection.