Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;7(3):461–467. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1329

Table III.

Characteristics of PET/CT imaging and of reference standards.

Authors FDG (MBq) Measures Reference standard Potential verification bias (Refs.)
Tateishi et al 300–370 Visualization, SUV Histology and radiological follow-up Very limited (6)
Strobel et al 350–400 Visualization, SUV Histology, clinical and imaging follow-up Very limited (7)
Shin et al 8.1/kg Visualization, SUV Histology, clinical and imaging follow-up Limited (8)
Charest et al 370–500 Visualization, SUV Histology Very limited (9)
Pepirkova et al 370–555 Visualization, SUV Histology Very limited (10)
Fuglø et al 4.0/kg Visualization, SUV Histopathology, clinical and imaging follow-up Limited (11)
Sharma et al 370 Visualization, SUV Histopathology, clinical and imaging follow-up Limited (12)
Xu et al 3.5/kg Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination Very limited (13)
Byun et al 7.4/kg Visualization, SUV Histology, clinical and imaging follow-up Very limited (14)
Iagaru et al 550 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (15)
Evilevitch et al 333–407 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (16)
Hamada et al 370 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (17)
Benz et al 7.8/kg Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (18)
Im et al 166–666 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (19)
Byun et al 370 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (20)
Byun et al 370 Visualization, SUV Histopathological examination of surgical specimen Very limited (21)

PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; SUV, standardized uptake value.