Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;7(3):461–467. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1329

Table IV.

Diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT on osseous and soft tissue sarcomas in the included studies.

Authors TP FP FN TN Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) (Refs.)
Byun et al 52 15 3 763 0.95 (0.85–0.99) 0.98 (0.97–0.99) (20)
Charest et al 153 0 10 49 0.94 (0.89–0.97) 1.00 (0.93–1.00) (9)
Fuglø et al 20 1 3 64 0.87 (0.66–0.97) 0.98 (0.92–1.00) (11)
Pepirkova et al 424 0 3 71 0.99 (0.98–1.00) 1.00 (0.95–1.00) (10)
Sharma et al 38 4 2 27 0.95 (0.83–0.99) 0.87 (0.70–0.96) (12)
Shin et al 36 16 9 30 0.80 (0.65–0.90) 0.65 (0.50–0.79) (8)
Strobel et al 30 4 3 13 0.91 (0.76–0.98) 0.76 (0.50–0.93) (7)
Tateishi et al 44 4 6 69 0.88 (0.76–0.95) 0.95 (0.87–0.98) (6)
Xu et al 51 8 10 34 0.84 (0.72–0.92) 0.81 (0.66–0.91) (13)
All cases 372 37 43 286 0.90 (0.86–0.92) 0.89 (0.85–0.92)
All lesions 848 52 49 1,120 0.95 (0.93–0.96) 0.96 (0.94–0.97)

PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; TP, true-positive; TN, true-negative; FP, false-positive; FN, false-negative; CI, confidence interval.