Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;7(3):461–467. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1329

Table V.

Accuracy of PET/CT assessment on the effect of neoadjuvant therapy on patients with osseous and soft tissue sarcomas in the included studies.

Authors TP FP FN TN Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) (Refs.)
Benz et al 3 1 1 7 0.75 (0.19–0.99) 0.88 (0.47–1.00) (18)
Byun et al 8 2 4 13 0.67 (0.35–0.90) 0.87 (0.60–0.98) (20)
Byun et al 11 1 1 8 0.92 (0.62–1.00) 0.89 (0.52–1.00) (21)
Evilevitch et al 8 10 0 24 1.00 (0.63–1.00) 0.71 (0.53–0.85) (16)
Hamada et al 5 0 0 4 1.00 (0.48–1.00) 0.88 (0.40–1.00) (17)
Iagaru et al 3 1 3 7 0.50 (0.12–0.88) 0.88 (0.47–1.00) (15)
Im et al 6 4 3 7 0.67 (0.30–0.93) 0.64 (0.31–0.89) (19)
Total 44 19 12 70 0.79 (0.30–0.93) 0.79 (0.69–0.89)

PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; TP, true-positive; TN, true-negative; FP, false-positive; FN, false-negative; CI, confidence interval.