. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Jun 29;144:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.06.006

Table 1.

Control behaviors in wild-type CS and trbl mutant flies.

Genotype	Shock avoidance	MCH acuity	Oct acuity	41 °C avoidance
Genotype	N = 48	N = 50	N = 54	N = 799
CS	73.8±3.1	25.7±4.5	29.4±5.4	0.64±0.03
trbl¹¹¹⁹/+	73.8±6.7	15.9±4.2	23.5±5.6	0.64±0.02
trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹	68.9±7.3	15.0±4.5	8.7±3.9*	0.58±0.02
trbl^3-54/+	77.2±4.8	12.3±6.8	17.5±4.5	0.63±0.02
trbl³⁵¹⁹/+	77.6±3.3	29.4±3.1	10.4±5.5	0.58±0.02
trbl^3-54/trbl³⁵¹⁹	77.6±4.2	16.3±3.0	12.5±7.1	0.54±0.02**

Few significant differences were found in the control behaviors of wild-type and trbl mutant flies. Shock avoidance: ANOVA F(5, 42)=0.40, p=0.85; MCH acuity: F(5, 44)=1.90 p=0.11; Oct acuity: F(5, 48)=2.37, p=0.05, trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹ was significantly different from CS after Multiple Comparisons, * = p < 0.05; 41 °C avoidance: Kruskal-Wallis Test H(5, N=799) =18.47, p =.002, the only significant difference between genotypes after Multiple Comparisons was between CS and trbl^3-54/trbl³⁵¹⁹ **= p < 0.01. The values represent means ± the SEMs.