. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Jun 29;144:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.06.006

Table 3.

Control behaviors for trbl mutant rescue in the aversive olfactory paradigm

Genotype	Shock acuity	MCH acuity	Oct acuity
Genotype	N = 18	N = 18	N = 12
c155Gal4/+; trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹	72.6±5.8	−4.4±2.2	11.1±9.2
UAS-trbl/+; trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹	65.4±5.7	9.6±4.3	24.7±8.3
c155Gal4/+;UAS-trbl/+; trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹	52.4±7.4	−4.1±6.7	12.8±13.2

Only a single significant difference was found for the aversive olfactory rescue experiment control behaviors. Shock avoidance: ANOVA F(2,15)=2.6, p=0.11; MCH acuity: F(2,12)=4.4, p=0.038; Oct acuity: F(2,9)= 0.5, p=0.62. MCH acuity is significantly different between c155Gal4/+;UAS-trbl/+; trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹ and UAS-trbl/+; trbl^3-54/trbl¹¹¹⁹, p=0.04 following Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. The values represent means ± the SEMs.