Table 5. Comparison of the rates of selection of predictors for the combinations with accuracy of about 90% and greater using the CI and gaming CI therapies.
Predictors | Rate of selection (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Current study (Gaming therapy) |
CI therapy (Hulbert at al. 2017) |
Difference (Gaming –CI therapy) |
|
8.WMFT forearm to table (gross motor) | 80.7 | 46.9 | 33.8 |
2.WMFT basket (fine motor) | 71.6 | 57.4 | 14.2 |
16.WMFT towel (fine motor) | 63.6 | 71.5 | -7.9 |
1.Stroke Affected Side | 60.2 | 29.6 | 30.6 |
18.TM (somatosensory) | 55.7 | 35.3 | 20.4 |
10.WMFT hand to table (gross motor) | 51.1 | 50.2 | 0.9 |
5.WMFT extend elbow weight (gross motor) | 48.9 | 39.4 | 9.5 |
17.BKT (somatosensory) | 43.2 | 59.8 | -16.6 |
4.WFMT extend elbow (gross motor) | 40.9 | 37.2 | 3.7 |
9.WMFT hand to box (gross motor) | 36.4 | 56.9 | -20.5 |
7.WMFT forearm to box (gross motor) | 34.1 | 51.6 | -17.5 |
6.WMFT flip cards (fine motor) | 26.1 | 35.8 | -9.7 |
15.WMFT reach retrieve (gross motor) | 22.7 | 63.0 | -40.3 |
12.WMFT lift paper clip (fine motor) | 21.6 | 56.4 | -34.8 |
3.WMFT can (fine motor) | 12.5 | 52.4 | -39.9 |
13.WMFT pencil (fine motor) | 3.4 | 57.5 | -54.1 |
11.WMFT key (fine motor) | 0.0 | 43.6 | -43.6 |
14.WMFT stack checkers (fine motor) | 0.0 | 32.0 | -32.0 |
WMFT: Wolf motor function test; BKT: Brief kinesthesia test; TM: Touch monofilament