Table 1.
Ethanolic leaf extract and positive control | DPPH radical scavenging activity | OH radical scavenging activity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of DPPH activity (%) | IC50 (µg/mL) | Percentage of OH· radical scavenging (%) | IC50 (µg/mL) | |
C. caudatus | 57.86 ± 1.69* | 305.39 | 59.99 ± 1.52*** | 335.07 |
H. sabdariffa | 65.19 ± 1.63* | 184.88 | 65.55 ± 2.45 | 281.42 |
Ascorbic acid | 74.68 ± 3.19 | 2.83 | 67.37 ± 2.88 | 3.83 |
Radical scavenging percentage values were represented as Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 replicates (n = 3). Ascorbic acid was used as positive control
All the values are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 3)
* Values are significantly different from positive control (ascorbic acid) at p < 0.05
** Values are significantly different from positive control (ascorbic acid) at p < 0.01
*** Values are significantly different from positive control (ascorbic acid) at p < 0.001