Table 2.
Exposure group | n/N | % >LOD | µX | 95% CI | Max | µ Y | (%) | (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Refinery 1 | |||||||||
Refinery process technicians | 68/132 | 42 | 15.3 | 10.4–22.5 | 3775 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 18 | 82 |
Outdoor process techniciansa,b | 59/108 | 48 | 20.7 | 12.7–33.6 | 3775 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 22 | 78 |
Process area | 40/71 | 44 | 9.6 | 6.4–15.5 | 144.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 9 | 91 |
Harbour and tank park | 19/37 | 57 | 74.5 | 34.6–160.5 | 3775 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 20 | 80 |
Indoor process techniciansa | 14/24 | 17 | 3.7 | 3.0–4.5 | 7.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 19 | 81 |
Maintenance workersb | 34/67 | 22 | 5.9 | 3.7–9.4 | 1324 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 14 | 86 |
Process area | 21/41 | 20 | 3.6 | 2.7–4.9 | 16.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 15 | 85 |
Harbour and tank park | 10/20 | 25 | 13.3 | 5.9–30.3 | 1324 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 11 | 89 |
Laboratory workers | 13/25 | 32 | 4.6 | 3.4–6.2 | 15.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 16 | 84 |
Engineers | 21/41 | 27 | 4.5 | 3.0–6.7 | 45.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 25 | 75 |
Safety and emergency staff | 7/14 | 43 | 5.1 | 3.9–6.6 | 9.9 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 24 | 76 |
Refinery 2 | |||||||||
Outdoor process technicians | 45/66 | 47 | 13.7 | 8.3–22.7 | 273.6 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 11 | 89 |
Process area | 35/51 | 45 | 13.3 | 7.5–23.8 | 159.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 18 | 82 |
Tank park | 10/15 | 53 | 15.8 | 5.1–48.4 | 273.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 3 | 97 |
Laboratory workers | 6/11 | 45 | 8.4 | 3.4–20.7 | 20.0 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 77 | 23 |
Engineers | 9/17 | 29 | 5.0 | 2.5–9.7 | 29.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 37 | 63 |
n number of workers, N number of measurements, % >LOD percentage of samples above the limit of detection (LOD), µ X arithmetic mean (AM), calculated as exp(µ Y + /2) where µ Y and are the mean and the variance of the log-transformed observations, CI confidence interval for the AM, Max maximum level detected, µ Y and mean and variance of the log-transformed observations, and between- and within-individual variance of the log-transformed observations
aSignificant difference in geometric mean (GM) between outdoor and indoor process technicians, p < 0.05, at Refinery 1
bSignificant difference in GM between outdoor process technicians and maintenance workers, p < 0.01, at Refinery 1