Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 30;35(2):65–76. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2017.35.2.65

Table 5. Comparisons of the available meta-analyses evaluating the relationship between testosterone therapy and prostate safety.

Variable Calof et al (2005) [49] Fernández-Balsells et al (2010) [51] Cui and Zhang (2013) [64] Cui et al (2014) [65] Guo et al (2016) [67] Kang et al (2015) [66] Boyle et al (2016) [62]
No. of trials included 19 51 16 22 16 15 27
No. of patients analyzed 1,084 2,679 1,030 2,351 1,921 1,124 2,213
Inclusion criteria Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
 Primary end point prostate safety × × × × × × ×
 Data presented according to trial duration × × × × × × ×
 Time restriction (>12 wk) × × × × × × ×
 Time restriction (>24 wk) × × × × × × ×
 Age restriction (≥45 yr) × × × × × × ×
Prostate adverse event analysis
 PSA change × × × × × × ×
 Prostate volume × × × × × × ×
 IPSS × × × × × × ×
 Abnormal PSA × × × × × × ×
 Prostate biopsy × × × × × × ×
 Prostate cancer × × × × × × ×

X indicates if Yes or No. PSA: prostatic specific antigen, IPSS: international prostatic symptoms score.