Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;41(4):303–315. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2017.41.4.303

Table 1. Principal fatty acids in the FFAs of the adolescents in each study group.

Fatty acid NW ONMS OWMS P valuea
Concentration, mg/dL No. (%) Concentration, mg/dL No. (%) Concentration, mg/dL No. (%)
Total FFA 103.25 31 (100) 106.16 32 (100) 121.90 32 (100) b,c,d
C16:0 (palmitic) 30.01 31 (28.71) 31.85 32 (30.00) 36.75 32 (30.15) b,c,d
C16:1 (palmitoleic) 1.74 8 (1.72) 1.84 19 (1.74) 2.28 27 (1.87) NS
C18:0 (stearic) 15.60 31 (15.16) 15.30 32 (14.41) 17.30 32 (14.20) b,c
C18:1 n-9c (oleic) 20.14 31 (19.01) 19.64 32 (18.50) 23.95 32 (19.65) NS
C18:2 n-6c (linoleic, LA) 21.80 31 (21.49) 22.35 32 (21.05) 25.07 32 (20.57) c,e
C20:3 n-6 (cis-8,11,14-dihomo-γ-linolenic, DGLA) 3.41 30 (3.36) 4.13 31 (3.89) 5.19 31 (4.26) b,c,d,f
C20:4 n (arachidonic, AA) 6.97 31 (7.01) 7.48 31 (7.05) 8.13 32 (6.67) b,c
C22:6 n-3 (cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-docosahexaenoic, DHA) 3.59 25 (3.54) 3.56 26 (3.36) 3.21 31 (2.63) NS
(LA+DGLA+AA)/DHA 8.96 25 9.00 26 11.96 31 NS

Data obtained from Bermudez et al. [10].

FFA, free fatty acid; NW, normal weight; ONMS, obese adolescents without metabolic syndrome (MetS); OWMS, obese adolescents with MetS; NS, not significant.

aP<0.05, bKruskal-Wallis, cNW vs. OWMS, dONMS vs. OWMS, eAnalysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons, fNW vs. ONMS.