Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 22;32(5):798–804. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.008

Table 1.

Summary of efficacy data from randomized, controlled phase III trials of bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer

Study Regimen ORR (CR + PR), % Median PFS, mon Median OS, mon
GOG-0218 [21] (n = 1,873) CP + placebo vs. CP + Bev vs. CP + Bev→Bev maintenance - 10.3 vs. 11.2 vs. 14.1 39.3 vs. 38.7 vs. 39.7
(HR, 0.908; p = 0.16)a (HR, 1.036; p = 0.76)a
(HR, 0.717; p < 0.001)b (HR, 0.915; p = 0.45)b
ICON 7 [22,23] (n = 1,528) CP vs. CP + Bev→Bev maintenance 48 vs. 67 17.4 vs. 19.8 44.6 vs. 44.5
(p < 0.001) (HR, 0.87; p = 0.04)
OCEANS [24,27] (n = 484) CG + placebo vs. CG + Bev 57.4 vs. 78.5 8.4 vs. 12.4 33.6c vs. 32.9c
(p < 0.0001) (HR, 0.484; p < 0.0001) (HR, 0.960; p = 0.736)
AURELIA [28,29] (n = 361) CTx (PLD, P, or Top) vs. CTx + Bev 11.8 vs. 27.3 3.4 vs. 6.7 13.3 vs. 16.6
(p = 0.001) (HR, 0.48; p < 0.001) (HR, 0.85; p = 0.174)

ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; GOG, Gynecologic Oncology Group; C, carboplatin; P, paclitaxel; Bev, bevacizumab; HR, hazard ratio; ICON, International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm; OCEANS, platinum-sensitive recurrent disease; G, gemcitabine; AURELIA, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; CTx, chemotherapy; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; Top, topotecan.

a

CP + Bev vs. CP + placebo.

b

CP + Bev→Bev vs. CP + placebo.

c

Interim data.