Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 1;11(7):RC05–RC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28492.10181

[Table/Fig-2]:

Comparison of PFN and PFNA groups in terms of quality of fixation, functional outcomes and complications.

Parameters PFN (23) PFNA (25) p-value
Percentage with tip-apex distance (TAD) ≥ 25 mm 4 (17.4%) 8 (32%) 0.32
Percentage with sub-optimal position (as per Cleveland index) 4 (17.4%) 8 (32%) 0.32
Average postoperative Harris hip score 75.37 78.85 0.54
Return to preinjury status (as per Parker Palmer mobility score) 8 (34.7%) 8 (32%) 0.83
Complications (overall) 8 (34.7%) 3 (12%) 0.08
Complications (implant related) 7 (30.4%) 1 (4%) 0.02
Complications (in patients with Singh’s index 3 or less) 3 (37.5%) 0 (0%) 0.04

(Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney test and qualitative variables were correlated using Chi-square test/Fisher’s-exact test)