[Table/Fig-3]:

Distribution of fat in right lobe of liver segments by CT and histological correlation. chart, representative 3-D bar diagram and scatter graph.

Correlations
Test used		RLLCT	RL_HIST	Liv5	Liv6	Liv7
RLLCT	Pearson Correlation	1	0.396*	-0.014	0.101	0.022
	Sig. (2-tailed)		0.030	0.942	0.594	0.909
	N	30	30	30	30	30
RL_HIST	Pearson Correlation	0.396*	1	0.460*	0.512**	0.458*
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.030		0.011	0.004	0.011
	N	30	30	30	30	30
Liv5	Pearson Correlation	-0.014	0.460*	1	0.966**	0.942**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.942	0.011		<0.001	<0.001
	N	30	30	30	30	30
Liv6	Pearson Correlation	0.101	0.512**	0.966**	1	0.958**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.594	0.004	<0.001		<0.001
	N	30	30	30	30	30
Liv7	Pearson Correlation	0.022	0.458*	0.942**	0.958**	1
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.909	0.011	0.000	0.000
	N	30	30	30	30	30
Liv8	Pearson Correlation	-0.062	0.406*	0.926**	0.914**	0.961**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.746	0.026	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	N	30	30	30	30	30
RT	Pearson Correlation	0.152	0.510**	0.938**	0.960**	0.956**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.422	0.004	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	N	30	30	30	30	30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*HIST – Histology, CT – Computed tomography, MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging, RLL – Right lobe of liver, Liv= Liver