[Table/Fig-4]:

Distribution of fat in left lobe of liver segments by CT and histological correlation. chart, representative 3-D bar diagram and scatter graph.

Correlations
		LL_HIST	LLCT	Liv2	Liv3	Liv4	@LT
LL_HIST	Pearson Correlation	1	-0.073	0.309	0.449*	0.446*	0.402*
	Sig. (2-tailed)		0.702	0.132	0.015	0.015	0.031
	N	30	30	25	29	29	29
LLCT	Pearson Correlation	-0.073	1	-0.344	-0.316	-0.236	-0.263
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.702		0.092	0.095	0.217	0.169
	N	30	30	25	29	29	29
Liv2	Pearson Correlation	0.309	-0.344	1	0.896**	0.868**	0.838**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.132	0.092		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	N	25	25	25	25	24	25
Liv3	Pearson Correlation	0.449*	-0.316	0.896**	1	0.870**	0.895**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.015	0.095	<0.001		<0.001	<0.001
	N	29	29	25	29	28	29
Liv4	Pearson Correlation	0.446*	-0.236	0.868**	0.870**	1	0.832**
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.015	0.217	<0.001	<0.001		<0.001
	N	29	29	24	28	29	28
@LT	Pearson Correlation	0.402*	-0.263	0.838**	0.895**	0.832**	1
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.031	0.169	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
	N	29	29	25	29	28	29

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

HIST – Histology, CT – Computed tomography, MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging, LLL – Left lobe of liver, Liv= Liver