Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 11;8(5):701–708. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12630

Table 2.

Summary of meta‐analyses of studies using home visits to manage diabetes

Outcome measure Trails Sample size (intervention/control) Measure of effects Intervention effect size (95% CI) P‐value of effect Heterogeneity
I 2 (%) P‐value
SBP (mmHg) 2 109 (59/50) MD −5.94 (−11.34, −0.54) 0.03* 0 0.001
DBP (mmHg) 2 109 (59/50) MD −6.32 (−12.00, −0.65) 0.03* 48 0.001
Quality of life 2 186 (95/91) SMD 11.81 (7.20, 16.42) 0.001** 23 0.25
High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) 2 109 (50/59) MD −5.11 (−9.80, −0.43) 0.03* 0 0.4
Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) 2 109 (50/59) MD −10.12 (−18.23, −2.00) 0.01** 0 0.75
Weight (kg) 2 123 (58/65) MD −5.06 (−12.61, 2.48) 0.19 16 0.28
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 2 109 (50/59) MD −4.06 (−18.28, 10.17) 0.58 0 0.93
Total triglycerides (mg/dL) 2 109 (50/59) MD 50.72 (15.69, 85.75) 0.005** 0 0.51
Body mass index (kg/m2) 1 164 (72/92) MD 1 (−0.13, 2.13) 0.08 NA NA
Self‐efficacy 1 120 (56/74) MD −1.80 (−5.37, 1.77) 0.32 NA NA
Self‐management 1 120 (56/74) MD 0.70 (0.51, 0.89) 0.001** NA NA

*< 0.05, **< 0.01. Heterogeneity (I 2): <50% = low, 50–75% = moderate, >75% = high. CI, confidence intervals; MD, mean difference; NA, not applicable; SMD, standardized mean difference.