Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 3;8(31):50930–50940. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15871

Table 2. Frequency of somatic and germline mutations in 12 candidate susceptibility genes in 412 high-grade serous ovarian cancer cases from TCGA and germline mutations in up to 4,508 ovarian cancer cases and 3,368 controls.

Gene Somatic variants(412 TCGA cases) Germline mutations
Mutationa
N (%)
LOHb
(%)
TCGA cases
N (%)
HG serouscases (%) Other cases
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
P-valuec
N=2,210 N=924 N=3,368
APEX1 2 (0.49) 29 1 (0.24) 1 (0.03) 2 (0.13) 3 (0.09) 0.52
EME1 0 52 1 (0.24) 3 (0.10) 1 (0.07) 3 (0.09) 0.91
FANCL 2 (0.49) 10 1 (0.24) 18 (0.60) 8 (0.54) 28 (0.83) 0.34
MAD2L2 1 (0.24) 34 2 (0.49) 1 (0.03) 0 0 -
PARP3 1 (0.24) 31 1 (0.24) 6 (0.20) 1 (0.07) 13 (0.39) 0.22
POLN 1 (0.24) 42 3 (0.73) 15 (0.50) 10 (0.67) 26 (0.77) 0.09
RAD54L 2 (0.49) 12 1 (0.24) 4 (0.13) 1 (0.20) 6 (0.18) 0.80
SMUG1 0 18 1 (0.24) 2 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 2 (0.06) 0.71
N=3,107 N=1,491 N=3,368
APLF 2 (0.49) 10 5 (1.21) 92 (3.1) 40 (2.7) 121 (3.6) 0.16
APTX 2 (0.49) 40 1 (0.24) 4 (0.13) 4 (0.27) 4 (0.12) 0.97
FANCM 2 (0.49) 41 1 (0.24) 29 (0.96) 6 (0.40) 13 (0.39) 0.008
PARP2 1 (0.24) 30 1 (0.24) 4 (0.13) 3 (0.20) 5 (0.15) 0.65

a germline mutation

b Loss of heterozygosity

c Comparison of high-grade serous cases with controls