Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;8(31):51416–51428. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18006

Table 2. (A) Concordance calculation between RT-qPCR and IHC for the biomarkers studied, (B) Methodologic discrepancies in receptor conversion recognition.

A) Concordance of RT-qPCR and IHC ER/ESR1 PR/PGR
Primary breast cancer (PT) 81% κ 0.51 70% κ 0.10
Metastatic breast cancer (MT) 84% κ 0.34 78% κ−0.32
B) Hormone receptor conversion RT-qPCR IHC
Total: 19 (20)*/55° 21 (22)*/53†
Both neg to both pos 0 1
Both pos to both neg 4 4
ER neg to pos/PR neg 1 1
ER neg to pos/PR pos 1 3
ER pos to neg/PR neg 2 0
ER pos to neg/PR pos 1 1
PR neg to pos/ER neg (1)* 1
PR neg to pos/ER pos 0 1
PR pos to neg/ER neg 0 1
PR pos to neg/ER pos 8 8 (9)*

*One patient had 2 MT biopsies for one PT, but only one MT biopsy showed a shift, thus the value including the shifting sample in brackets.

°RT-qPCR total comprises 55 patients as % tumor cells were insufficient for accurate statement of hormone receptor positivity/negativity in 11 MT and 1 PT.

†IHC total comprises 53 samples as immunohistochemistry was missing for 14 samples.