Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aquat Toxicol. 2017 Jun 27;190:162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.06.026

Table 2.

Areas of yolk sac, pericardial cavity, and swim bladder in F0 larvae at 14 dpf following exposure to ERSE, hypoxia, or co-exposure as embryos (n = 15). All data are means ± SEM. Before averaging, values have been normalized to standard body length for each individual. Treatments compared to their concurrant controls.

Treatments Standard length (μm) Yolk sac area (μm2) Pericardial cavity area (μm2) Swim bladder area (μm2)
0.0% ERSE 472.4 ± 29.8 813.2 ± 198.1 201.6 ± 31.4 719.9 ± 112.4
0.1% ERSE 460.4 ± 37.1 945.5 ± 453.7 211.3 ± 104.5 843.5 ± 201.7
0.5% ERSE 455.9 ± 12.9 637.8 ± 400.3 316.2 ± 74.5 859.9 ± 197.2
1.0% ERSE 447.0 ± 10.1 897.0 ± 284.1 478.3 ± 138.6a 958.2 ± 126.3
H1 422.6 ± 20.2a 2340.8 ± 556.3a 268.2 ± 61.5 571.2 ± 67.1a
H1+0.1%ERSE 394.5 ± 24.4a 3530.2 ± 921.4a 305.8 ± 163.1a 422.9 ± 121.1a
H2 414.0 ± 11.7a 1482.7 ± 775.2 330.5 ± 43.9 537.5 ± 136.8
H2+ 0.1% ERSE 419.3 ± 33.9a 1751.5 ± 490.3a 257.9 ± 70.0 458.7 ± 187.4a
H3 449.7 ± 24.9 1334.5 ± 408.2a 195.9 ± 36.4 643.6 ± 153.5
H3+0.1% ERSE 436.8 ± 29.9a 2097.0 ± 884.1a 278.3 ± 138.6 559.9 ± 185.6a
a

indicates that there is a significant difference from control (p < 0.05).

Note: Example of tracing for areas given in Fig. S2A