. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 5.

Published in final edited form as: J Community Psychol. 2009 Aug 21;37(7):830–845. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20333

Table 2.

Effects Standardized Coefficients of Baseline Scores, Baseline Centralization, Follow-Up Centralization, Baseline Density, and Follow-Up Density on Community-Level Attitudes and Practices Regarding Adoption of Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Programs

	Functioning b	Planning b	Achievement b	Progress b	Composite scores b
Advice
Baseline score	.54^**	.55^*	.65^***	.58^**	.66^***
Intervention	−.14	.23	.25	−.29	.04
Wave 1 density	.31	.50^*	.23	.47^*	.44^*
Wave 1 outdegree centralization	−.27	−.21	−.22	−.14	−.26
Wave 2 density	−.90^***	−.59^*	−.34	−.85^**	−.76^**
Wave 2 outdegree centralization	−.64^**	−.03	−.46^*	−.61^*	−.47^*
Adjusted R²	0.63	0.46	0.64	0.51	0.69
Discussion
Baseline score	.44^*	.22	.58^*	.36^*	.43^*
Intervention	.16	.31^*	.37^*	−.001	.26^*
Wave 1 density	.35	.53^*	.32	.62^*	.49^*
Wave 1 indegree centralization	−.42^*	.04	−.36	−.52^*	−.34^*
Wave 2 density	−.73^**	−.68^**	−.36	−.84^**	−.72^**
Wave 2 indegree centralization	.70^*	.61^*	.41	.74^*	.67^*
Adjusted R²	0.47	0.72	0.52	0.55	0.66

Note. N =20 with complete, merged network and community leader data.

p <.05;

^**

p <.01;

^***

p <.001.