Appendix 5—table 1. Statistical comparison of wild-type Canton-S R1-R6 rhabdomere cross-sectional areas.
The table gives the differences as p-values, calculated for 25 ommatidia of 10 flies at the same retinal depth. Red indicates statistically significant difference. R4 rhabdomeres are smaller than the other rhabdomeres, whereas R1 and R6 are always the largest.
| Significance t-test 2-tail | wild-type R1 | wild-type R2 | wild-type R3 | wild-type R4 | wild-type R5 | wild-type R6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wild-type R1 | N/A | 5.3626 × 10−7 | 1.3033 × 10−4 | 3.6882 × 10−10 | 1.5564 × 10−5 | 0.8282 |
| wild-type R2 | 5.3626 × 10−7 | N/A | 0.1531 | 0.0371 | 0.3760 | 3.4906 × 10−7 |
| wild-type R3 | 1.3033 × 10−4 | 0.1531 | N/A | 0.0011 | 0.5736 | 1.3187 × 10−4 |
| wild-type R4 | 3.6882 × 10−10 | 0.0371 | 0.0011 | N/A | 0.0047 | 1.2193 × 10−10 |
| wild-type R5 | 1.5564 × 10−5 | 0.3760 | 0.5736 | 0.0047 | N/A | 1.3479 × 10−5 |
| wild-type R6 | 0.8282 | 3.4906 × 10−7 | 1.3187 × 10−4 | 1.2193 × 10−10 | 1.3479 × 10−5 | N/A |