Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;6:e26117. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26117

Appendix 5—table 3. Statistical comparison of wild-type and hdcJK910 R1-R6 rhabdomere cross-sectional areas.

The table gives the differences as p-values, calculated for 25 ommatidia of 10 flies at the same retinal depth. Red indicates statistically significant difference. The wild-type and mutant R3 and R4 rhabdomeres are the same size (highlighted in bold); the other wild-type rhabdomeres are larger than their respective counterparts.

Significance t-test 2-tail wild-type R1 wild-type R2 wild-type R3 wild-type R4 wild-type R5 wild-type R6
hdcJK910 R1 0.0014 0.0012 0.1434 1.0091 × 10−7 0.0302 0.0015
hdcJK910 R2 1.8211 × 10−11 0.0078 1.5520 × 10−4 0.6952 7.1690 × 10−4 3.5405 × 10−12
hdcJK910 R3 5.1489 × 10−5 0.0073 0.4818 1.8478 × 10−7 0.1415 3.8432 × 10−5
hdcJK910 R4 1.7483 × 10−11 0.0051 1.0904 × 10−4 0.5015 4.9066 × 10−4 3.7421 × 10−12
hdcJK910 R5 9.2505 × 10−12 0.0056 1.0272 × 10−4 0.6710 4.8280 × 10−4 1.5313 × 10−12
hdcJK910 R6 5.6987 × 10−5 0.0083 0.4903 2.8960 × 10−7 0.1480 4.3539 × 10−5