Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;7:10562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10640-3

Table 1.

Results of linear models examining global-scale variation of riparian litter traits [nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, log-transformed N:P ratio, magnesium (Mg) and tannin (Tan) concentrations, and log-transformed specific leaf area (SLA)], depending on key climatic and soil predictors (mean annual temperature, MAT; mean annual precipitation, MAP; soil pH, SoilpH; and soil N concentration, SoilN) and on other litter traits.

Litter trait Model Factor Estimate Std. Error t p %Variance
N N ~ P + Tan + MAT + MAP + MAT × MAP + SoilpH
Variance explained: 37% Intercept 1.0282 0.0383 26.87 <0.001
Total df: 164 P 0.1880 0.0133 14.17 <0.001 66.30
Residual df: 157 Tan −0.0910 0.0232 −3.92 <0.001 15.34
MAT 0.0306 0.0442 0.69 0.489 3.05
MAP 0.4176 0.0652 6.41 <0.001 12.49
MAT × MAP −0.1550 0.0416 −3.72 <0.001 1.27
SoilpH 0.1866 0.0340 5.49 <0.001 1.55
P P ~ N + MAT + SoilpH + SoilN
Variance explained: 34% Intercept 0.0461 0.0014 33.92 <0.001
Total df: 164 N 0.0143 0.0017 8.55 <0.001 84.88
Residual df: 159 MAT −0.0043 0.0022 −1.98 0.049 6.55
SoilpH 0.0042 0.0019 2.24 0.026 3.33
SoilN 0.0068 0.0019 3.65 <0.001 5.23
N:P Log N:P ~ Tan + MAT + MAP + MAT × MAP
Variance explained: 18% Intercept 3.8256 0.0333 114.73 <0.001
Total df: 165 Tan −0.0753 0.0206 −3.66 <0.001 11.00
Residual df: 160 MAT 0.2091 0.0515 4.06 <0.001 71.25
MAP −0.0013 0.0487 −0.03 0.979 15.32
MAT × MAP −0.0818 0.0412 −1.99 0.049 2.43
Mg Mg ~ N + P + N:P + MAP + SoilpH + SoilN
Variance explained: 14% (Intercept) 4.3896 0.1723 25.48 <0.001
Total df: 164 N 0.3710 0.1357 2.73 0.007 4.09
Residual df: 157 P −0.4528 0.2042 −2.22 0.028 3.51
N:P −0.8064 0.2391 −3.37 0.001 25.55
MAP −0.8824 0.2555 −3.45 0.001 21.49
SoilpH −0.9425 0.1800 −5.24 <0.001 6.95
SoilN −0.9481 0.1482 −6.40 <0.001 38.41
Tan Tan ~ N + Mg + MAT + MAP + MAT × MAP + SoilpH
Variance explained: 17% Intercept 8.789 0.778 11.30 <0.001
Total df: 164 N −1.958 0.405 −4.83 <0.001 48.59
Residual df: 157 Mg −1.153 0.266 −4.34 <0.001 20.86
MAT −1.913 0.845 −2.26 0.025 1.64
MAP 4.420 1.083 4.08 <0.001 12.06
MAT × MAP −1.714 0.741 −2.31 0.022 15.11
SoilpH −1.260 0.469 −2.69 0.008 1.74
SLA Log SLA ~ P + Tan + MAT + SoilN
Variance explained: 34% Intercept 5.019 0.023 219.30 <0.001
Total df: 138 P 0.106 0.024 4.36 <0.001 20.96
Residual df: 133 Tan −0.172 0.023 −7.53 <0.001 46.24
MAT −0.170 0.025 −6.94 <0.001 25.72
SoilN −0.136 0.031 −4.34 <0.001 7.08

We show the proportion of variance explained by each model and the total and residual degrees of freedom (df; numerator df = 1 in all cases) and, for each factor, we show the mean estimate and standard error, t-statistic, p-value and proportion of variance explained; bold type indicates significant relationships at the p < 0.05 level.