Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;19:65. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0374-2

Table 3.

Flow measurements using the Fick technique and using velocity encoded CMR

Fick versus Phase Contrast in catheterizations without shunt (n = 34)
 Fick pulmonary blood flow (Qp, L/min/m2) 3.3 ± 0.7
 Fick systemic blood flow (Qs, L/min/m2) 3.3 ± 0.7
 Fick pulmonary: systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) 1 ± 0.1
 Fick pulmonary vascular resistance (indexed Woods units) 2.4 ± 1.9
 Phase Contrast Main Pulmonary Artery indexed (Qp, L/min/m2) 2.9 ± 0.6*
 Phase Contrast Aorta indexed (Qs, L/min/m2) 2.8 ± 0.6*
 Phase Contrast pulmonary: systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) 1 ± 0.1
 Phase Contrast pulmonary vascular resistance (indexed Woods units) 2.5 ± 2.1
Fick versus Phase Contrast in catheterizations with shunt (n = 11)
 Fick pulmonary blood flow (Qp, L/min/m2) 5.6 ± 2.1
 Fick systemic blood flow (Qs, L/min/m2) 3.4 ± 0.8
 Fick pulmonary: systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) 1.8 ± 0.9
 Fick pulmonary vascular resistance (indexed Woods units) 1.9 ± 1.6
 Phase Contrast Main Pulmonary Artery indexed (Qp, L/min/m2) 5.1 ± 2.1
 Phase Contrast Aorta indexed (Qs, L/min/m2) 2.8 ± 0.7*
 Phase Contrast pulmonary: systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs) 2 ± 0.9*
 Phase Contrast pulmonary vascular resistance (indexed Woods units) 2.1 ± 2

*p<0.05 Student t-test (two-tailed)

*p<0.05 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test (two-tailed)