Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 9;331(7508):84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38495.686736.E0

Table 2.

Primary outcomes at baseline and follow-up and difference over time between groups

Median (interquartile range) or proportion (%)
Measurement Minimal intervention strategy Usual care Mean difference*or odds ratio(95% CI)
Functional disability (RDQ, 0-24)


Baseline
13 (7-16) (n=143)
13 (8-16) (n=171)
Mean difference 0.25 (−0.77 to 1.28)
6 weeks
4 (1-9) (n=142)
4 (1-10) (n=163)
13 weeks
2 (0-6) (n=140)
2 (0-5) (n=163)
26 weeks
1 (0-4) (n=134)
1 (0-3) (n=163)
52 weeks 1 (0-4) (n=132) 1 (0-4) (n=154)
No recovery
Baseline
-
-
Odds ratio 1.16 (0.63 to 2.17)
6 weeks
56/142 (39)
60/163 (38)
13 weeks
47/141 (33)
53/164 (32)
26 weeks
44/136 (32)
50/163 (31)
52 weeks 42/132 (32) 43/156 (28)
Sick leave because of low back pain§


Baseline
40/115 (35)
57/139 (41)
Odds ratio 0.69 (0.43 to 1.13)
6 weeks
19/116 (16)
26/132 (20)
13 weeks
5/114 (4)
17/134 (13)
26 weeks
3/110 (3)
11/134 (8)
52 weeks 8/107 (8) 9/128 (7)

RDQ=Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (higher scores mean more functional disability).

*

Minimum intervention strategy (MIS) minus usual care (UC), adjusted for baseline values and estimated with multilevel analysis. Mean difference >0 means that over 12 months MIS group had higher mean score on functional disability than UC group.

MIS versus UC, estimated with multilevel analysis. For sick leave, adjusted for baseline values. An odds ratio >1 means that over 12 months more patients in MIS group than in the UC group reported sick leave or no recovery.

Yes=slightly improved + no change + slightly worse + much worse + very much worse.

§

Proportion of patients on sick leave because of low back pain among working population.