Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;73(Pt 9):738–748. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317010348

Table 1. Data integration and refinement statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell; the data were truncated at I/σ(I) > 1.0 (Diederichs & Karplus, 2013).

  Single crystal (PDB entry 5o4w) Merged data (PDB entry 5o4x)
Data integration
 Space group P21212
a, b, c (Å) 104.56, 68.05, 32.05
 α, β, γ (°) 90.0, 90.0, 90.0
 No. of crystals 1 7
 Resolution (Å) 41.46–2.11 (2.17–2.11) 57.03–2.11 (2.17–2.11)
R merge (%) 26.3 (56.6) 39.8 (64.0)
 〈I/σ(I)〉 2.6 (1.0) 2.7 (1.0)
 Completeness (%) 49.5 (49.8) 61.7 (49.8)
 Reflections 12601 (1462) 41191 (1462)
 Unique reflections 6749 (545) 8560 (545)
Structure solution
 Translation-function Z-score 22.5 26.7
 LLG score 395 535
Refinement
 Reflections 6717 8503
R1 (%) 33.5 26.4
R complete (%) 35.0 27.9
 〈B〉 (Å2) 24.0 27.0
 R.m.s.Z, bonds 0.92 0.85
 R.m.s.Z, angles 1.27 0.97
 Ramachandran plot
  Favoured (%) 93.7 98.4
  Allowed (%) 5.9 1.6
  Outliers (%) 0.4 0.0

Data-integration statistics for the individual crystals used for merging are shown in Supplementary Table S1; data-merging statistics are presented in Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S4.

We present R1 and R complete instead of R work and R free. For less than 10 000 unique reflections R complete is preferred over R free, since it is calculated from all reflections (Brünger, 1997; Luebben & Gruene, 2015). Since all structure factors are used, this in turn leads to a more robust calculation than R free. Using this validation method, the actual refinement uses all reflections; hence, R work is equivalent to R1.