Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;6(7):e006057. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006057

Table 4.

Predictive Performance, Reclassification, and Discrimination

AUC (95% CI) P Value cNRI (95% CI) P Value IDI (95% CI) P Value Calibration χ2 (P Value)
Compared with RF only
 RF only 0.769 (0.716–0.823) ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· 5.80 (0.67)
 RF+AF‐GS 0.791 (0.741–0.841) 0.055 0.468 (0.240–0.696) <0.0001 0.029 (0.009–0.049) 0.005 2.69 (0.95)
 RF+BA‐GS 0.784 (0.732–0.835) 0.222 0.309 (0.079–0.538) 0.009 0.022 (0.006–0.038) 0.007 4.65 (0.79)
 RF+both GSs 0.803 (0.754–0.853) 0.031 0.524 (0.298–0.751) <0.0001 0.050 (0.024–0.076) 0.0002 3.60 (0.89)
Compared with RF+BA‐GS
 RF+both GSs 0.803 (0.754–0.853) 0.048 0.474 (0.247–0.702) <0.0001 0.028 (0.009–0.047) 0.003 3.60 (0.89)
Compared with RF+AF‐GS
 RF+both GSs 0.803 (0.754–0.853) 0.219 0.252 (0.021–0.483) 0.032 0.021 (0.007–0.036) 0.004 3.60 (0.89)

RFs for atrial fibrillation from model 2: age; sex; body mass index; height; weight; smoking status (in the previous 12 months and ever); systolic blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; hypertension; diabetes mellitus; coronary artery disease; dyslipidemia; congestive heart failure; valvular heart disease; chronic renal failure; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and relative lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes. AF‐GS indicates atrial fibrillation gene score; AUC indicates area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BA‐GS, biological age gene score; cNRI, continuous net reclassification improvement index; GS, gene score; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement index; RF, risk factor.