Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;128:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.001

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ERPs and scalp distributions of PCA temporospatial factor combinations accounting for >1% unique variance in the ERP waves and significantly differentiating acceptance from rejection feedback. ERPs are presented at the electrode where each component was maximal (see Table 1). Scalp distributions reflect the relative response to acceptance vs. rejection (i.e., rejection minus acceptance for TF4/SF1 and acceptance minus rejection for remaining components).