Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Target Oncol. 2017 Apr;12(2):201–209. doi: 10.1007/s11523-016-0467-0

Table 4.

Patient Outcome, by Study Component

Outcome Estimate
(% or 95% CI)

Phase I Cohort Phase II Cohort


Sorafenib +
Bevacizumab
Sorafenib +
Bevacizumab
Sorafenib All Patients
Best Objective Response
  Evaluablea 16 4 2 6
  Not Evaluable 1 0 1 1
  CR 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
  PR 2 (12.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
  SD 9 (56.3%) 2 (50.0%) 2 (100.0%) 4 (66.7%)
  PD 5 (31.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (33.3%)
  Confirmed CR/PR 1 (6.3%) 2 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Time to Progression
  Events 14 4 2 6
  Medianb (95% CI) 3.0 (1.7–7.2) 2.1 (0.4–8.6) 16.3 (11.4–16.3) 8.6 (0.4–16.3)
  % Progression-Free
    2 mos 69.7% (41.7–86.1) 50.0% (5.8–84.5) 100.0% 71.4% (25.8–92.0)
    4 mos 44.3% (20.2–66.1) 25.0% (0.9–66.5) 100.0% 57.1% (17.2–83.7)
Survival
  Events 16 4 1 5
  Medianb (95% CI) 9.2 (3.7–11.9) 10.4 (4.4–13.3) NE (13.9-NE) 13.3 (4.4-NE)
  % Alive
    6 mos 64.7% (37.7–82.3) 75.0% (12.8–96.1) 100.0% 85.7% (33.4–97.9)
    1 year 23.5% (7.3–44.9) 50.0% (5.8–84.5) 100.0% 71.4% (25.8–92.0)
a

Number of patients having at least 1 post-baseline assessment

b

Kaplan-Meier methodology