Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;17(10):1374–1385. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30364-3

Table 2.

Confirmed best overall response

Confirmed best overall response* (n=88)
Complete response 8 (9%)
Partial response 20 (23%)
Stable disease 9 (10%)
Progressive disease 32 (36%)
Non-complete response/non-progressive disease 1 (1%)
Non-assessable 18 (20%)
Objective response§ 31·8%(21·9–43·1)

Data are n (%) or % (95·9% CI).

*

Confirmed best overall response was according to independent review committee assessment and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

One patient did not have measurable disease at baseline and thus a best overall response of partial response or stable disease could not be distinguished.

Patients not assessable for a confirmed best overall response had no baseline lesions identified by the independent review committee (n=4), baseline but no post-baseline assessments (n=10; four patients died within 6 weeks after the start of treatment and six additional patients discontinued study treatment in the first 6 weeks), all non-assessable post-baseline assessments (n=2), no post-baseline tumour assessment before the start of new anticancer therapy (n=1), or stable disease of insufficient duration (<6 weeks after start date without further tumour assessment; n=1).

§

A repeated CI for the objective response in the modified intention-to-treat analysis set (95·9% CI for the primary analysis) was calculated to account for the group sequential testing approach.40