Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183885

Table 3. Predicting access to secondary school (N = 2013; Age 12–25).


Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age (y) 0.94*** 0.90 0.97 0.94*** 0.91 0.97 0.93*** 0.90 0.97 0.93*** 0.90 0.97
Gender (Ref = male) 1.14 0.86 1.50 1.14 0.86 1.50 1.16 0.88 1.54 1.17 0.88 1.55
Religion (Ref = Hindu)
    Muslim 1.45 0.95 2.21 1.45 0.95 2.21 1.42 0.93 2.17 1.44 0.94 2.20
    Other 0.89 0.41 0.19 0.89 0.41 1.92 0.89 0.41 1.92 0.88 0.40 1.90
Disability (Ref = Not disabled) 0.98 0.69 1.38 1.93** 1.18 3.14
    Physical and sensory (n = 61) NA NA NA 0.89 0.4 1.92 NA NA NA NA NA NA
    Mental and cognitive (n = 233) NA NA NA 0.97 0.63 1.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA
    Multiple (n = 94) NA NA NA 1.06 0.55 2.06 NA NA NA NA NA NA
        Mild and moderate NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.67 0.43 1.05
        Severe NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.76* 1.08 2.88
Asset Index (Ref = Richest quintile (5th))
    1st quintile 5.53*** 3.34 9.15 5.54*** 3.35 9.16 5.32*** 3.21 8.80 5.43*** 3.28 9.00
    2nd quintile 2.57*** 1.53 4.32 2.57*** 1.53 4.32 2.50*** 1.49 4.21 2.53*** 1.50 4.26
    3rd quintile 1.12 0.65 1.95 1.12 0.65 1.95 1.10 0.63 1.92 1.12 0.64 1.94
    4th quintile 0.92 0.51 1.65 0.92 0.51 1.65 0.93 0.52 1.66 0.92 0.51 1.64
Head of household gender (Ref = Male) 1.49* 1.02 2.17 1.48* 1.01 2.16 1.48* 1.01 2.17 1.49* 1.01 2.17
Head of household education (Ref = Educated) 1.39* 1.00 1.93 1.39* 0.52 0.99 1.39* 0.99 1.93 1.40* 1.01 1.95
Household size (Ref = 1–4)
    5–7 1.99*** 1.31 3.01 2.00*** 1.32 3.03 2.04*** 1.35 3.10 2.05*** 1.35 3.11
    8 or above 3.66*** 2.30 5.83 3.68*** 2.31 5.87 3.84*** 2.40 6.14 3.83*** 2.39 6.12

Note: CI, confidence interval; LL, upper limit; UL, upper limit; OR: odds ratio, significance at the ***(p ≤ 0.001), **(p ≤ 0.01), *(p ≤ 0.05).

Base choice for each outcome is no access to school. The reference category for a predictor is in parentheses.

A This model treated the disability predictor as Not disabled (n = 1625) vs. any disability (n = 388)

B This model treated the disability predictor as Not disabled vs. disabled across different types

C This model treated the disability predictor as Not severely disabled (n = 1887) vs. severely disability (n = 126)

D This model treated the disability predictor as Not disabled (n = 1625) vs. mild and moderate (n = 260) or severe (n = 128)