Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Res. 2017 Jul 15;124:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.07.012

Table 2.

Distance run, location, and task compliance of mice during weekly treadmill fatigue tests.

Week PBS (n=12) TAL (n=11) MPH (n=11) Main effect of treatment

F value P value
Distance (m) 1 296 ± 52 779 ± 118** 333 ± 66 F(2,31) = 10.64 P = 0.0003
2 443 ± 104 954 ± 110** 228 ± 78 F(2,31) = 13.96 P < 0.0001
3 247 ± 92 837 ± 156** 172 ± 57 F(2,31) = 10.99 P = 0.0002
4 129 ± 54 907 ± 157** 278 ± 311 F(2,31) = 14.60 P < 0.0001

Location 1 2.1 ± 0.11 2.9 ± 0.03*** 2.5 ± 0.12* F(2,31) = 17.62 P < 0.0001
2 2.1 ± 0.16 2.9 ± 0.04*** 2.3 ± 0.10 F(2,30) = 14.36 P < 0.0001
3 1.9 ± 0.22 2.7 ± 0.15* 2.2 ± 0.12 F(2,29) = 5.175 P = 0.0120
4 1.9 ± 0.30 2.9 ± 0.06* 2.2 ± 0.12 F(2,26) = 10.45 P = 0.0005

Number of Non-Runners 1 1 0 2
2 2 0 4
3 6 1 3
4 7 1 3

Data for the PBS group in this table were previously published and reproduced with permission from ref 30.

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001 compared to PBS, post-hoc t-tests with a Holm-Bonferroni correction.