Table 2.
Estimates of local adaptation from reciprocal cross‐infection studies. We reviewed studies of local adaptation and identified those where a reciprocal cross‐infection study was performed in the laboratory, allowing local adaptation to be calculated using Equation (1) and the resulting value compared directly to simulation results. In some cases, we selected fully reciprocal combinations from larger studies and thereby excluded populations that were not reciprocally exposed. Bold entries are those for which local adaptation is sufficiently large for our technique to be useful
Estimated magnitude (averaged across replicates) | Species | Reference |
---|---|---|
0.058 |
Microbotryum violaceum
Silene latifolia |
(Kaltz, Gandon, Michalakis, & Shykoff, 1999) |
0.108 |
Melampsora amygdalina
Salix triandra |
(Niemi, Wennström, Hjältén, Waldmann, & Ericson, 2006) |
0.110 |
Schistocephalus solidus
Gasterosteus aculeatus |
(Weber et al., 2017) |
0.188 |
Microphallus
sp.
Potamopyrgus antipodarum |
(Lively, 1989 ) |
0.252 |
Microphallus
sp.
Potamopyrgus antipodarum |
(Lively & Dybdahl, 2000 ) |
0.236 |
Protopolystoma
spp.
Xenopus laevis |
(Jackson & Tinsley, 2005 ) |
0.103 |
Plasmodium spp. Parus major |
(Jenkins, Delhaye, & Christe, 2015) |