Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 28;7(17):6894–6903. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3107

Table 2.

Estimates of local adaptation from reciprocal cross‐infection studies. We reviewed studies of local adaptation and identified those where a reciprocal cross‐infection study was performed in the laboratory, allowing local adaptation to be calculated using Equation (1) and the resulting value compared directly to simulation results. In some cases, we selected fully reciprocal combinations from larger studies and thereby excluded populations that were not reciprocally exposed. Bold entries are those for which local adaptation is sufficiently large for our technique to be useful

Estimated magnitude (averaged across replicates) Species Reference
0.058 Microbotryum violaceum
Silene latifolia
(Kaltz, Gandon, Michalakis, & Shykoff, 1999)
0.108 Melampsora amygdalina
Salix triandra
(Niemi, Wennström, Hjältén, Waldmann, & Ericson, 2006)
0.110 Schistocephalus solidus
Gasterosteus aculeatus
(Weber et al., 2017)
0.188 Microphallus sp.
Potamopyrgus antipodarum
(Lively, 1989 )
0.252 Microphallus sp.
Potamopyrgus antipodarum
(Lively & Dybdahl, 2000 )
0.236 Protopolystoma spp.
Xenopus laevis
(Jackson & Tinsley, 2005 )
0.103 Plasmodium spp.
Parus major
(Jenkins, Delhaye, & Christe, 2015)