Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;7:10677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10744-w

Table 2.

Comparison of the execution time of some real networks.

Type Name N L n pd t new (sec) t old (sec) Speedup
Biological E. Coli 30 423 578 0.730 0.001 0.016 16.0
TRN-Yeast-131 4441 12873 0.999 0.015 0.062 4.1
TRN-Yeast-232 688 1079 0.920 0.001 0.015 15.0
Human PPI33 6339 34814 0.585 0.032 1.295 40.5
Trust Slashdot090234 82168 948464 0.912 0.421 1568.3 3725.2
Slashdot081134 77360 905468 0.910 0.234 1388.9 5935.5
WikiVote35 7115 103689 0.666 0.047 2.044 43.5
SciMet36 3084 10416 0.661 0.015 0.187 12.5
Kohonen37 4470 12731 0.669 0.016 0.172 10.8
Internet p2p-138 10876 39994 0.911 0.062 2.746 44.3
p2p-238 8846 31839 0.926 0.046 1.732 37.6
p2p-338 8717 31525 0.933 0.031 1.700 54.8
Product co-purchasing Amazon030239 262111 1234877 0.177 1.685 14119.4 8379.5
Amazon031239 400727 3200440 0.127 9.344 36696 3927.2
Amazon050539 410236 3356824 0.915 7.519 45453 6045.2
Amazon060139 403394 3387388 0.053 2.886 49293 17080.1
Social network Twitter40 81306 1768149 0.800 2.230 2532.5 1135.6
Higgs_Twitter41 456626 14855842 0.297 12.589 66445.2 5278.0
UClonline42 1899 20296 0.819 0.016 0.296 18.5
Facebook_34840 572 6384 0.612 0.001 0.062 62.0

For each network, we show its type, name, number of nodes (N) and edges (L), density of all possible input nodes n pd, the execution time of our method t new, the execution time of previous algorithm22 t old, and the speedup ratio.