Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;14(3):3415–3420. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6614

Table II.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association of prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with overall survival.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristic RR P-value 95% Cl RR P-value 95% Cl
Sex
  Male vs. female 1.794 0.138 0.828–3.887
Age, years
  ≤60 vs. >60 0.821 0.531 0.443–1.522
Smoking
  No vs. yes 1.237 0.497 0.670–2.287
Alcohol
  No vs. yes 1.446 0.296 0.724–2.887
Tumor size, cm
  ≤3 vs. >3 2.058 0.041a 1.029–4.114 1.322 0.449 0.642–2.721
pT
  T1 and T2 vs. T3 1.493 0.102 0.924–2.414
Pathological grade
  II and II vs. III 1.344 0.267 0.797–2.264
Lymph node metastasis
  No vs. yes 5.76 0.001a 3.043–10.905 4.256 0.001a 2.161–8.380
MAGE-A9
  High vs. low 4.067 0.001a 1.932–8.560 2.93 0.006a 1.367–6.277
a

P<0.05. MAGE-A9, melanoma-associated antigen-9; pT, pathological tumor stage; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.