Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;37(36):8595–8611. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0878-17.2017

Table 1.

Summary of the measurements of evoked synaptic strength in all pair typesa

Eself1 Epartner1 Epartner2 Eself2
E1-E2 (Fig. 2)
    Control, n = 25 3.84 ± 0.71 2.28 ± 0.52 2.47 ± 0.43 3.32 ± 0.68
    Mutant, n = 27 4.37 ± 0.73 2.21 ± 0.64 4.43 ± 0.67 7.49 ± 1.41
    p 0.637 0.353 0.016 0.008
I-E (Fig. 3) Iself Ipartner Epartner Eself
    Control, n = 20 4.05 ± 0.69 1.72 ± 0.24 7.91 ± 1.48 3.37 ± 0.997
    Mutant, n = 23 8.84 ± 1.54 2.08 ± 0.33 16.48 ± 2.51 8.12 ± 1.71
    p 0.029 0.436 0.005 0.044
I1-I2 (Fig. 4) Iself1 Ipartner1 Ipartner2 Iself2
    Control, n = 20 5.21 ± 1.25 2.49 ± 0.65 2.58 ± 0.56 5.22 ± 1.49
    Mutant, n = 20 5.33 ± 0.85 2.97 ± 0.77 4.54 ± 0.80 13.92 ± 2.07
    p 0.414 0.705 0.033 0.002
E-I (Fig. 5) Eself Epartner Ipartner Iself
    Control, n = 21 3.10 ± 0.97 8.71 ± 1.35 2.28 ± 0.32 4.42 ± 0.69
    Mutant, n = 18 2.35 ± 0.70 4.74 ± 0.81 4.81 ± 0.73 9.92 ± 2.01
    p 0.278 0.024 0.007 0.014

aData are mean ± SEM of the peak synaptic current (nA) in response to a 2 ms depolarization to 0 mV delivered at 0.1–0.2 Hz. Measurements in the first column correspond to green traces, second column to blue traces, third column to gray traces, and fourth column to orange traces in Figures 25. p values were obtained from Mann–Whitney tests.