Table 1.
Summary statistics on reporting of visit irregularity, predictors of visit times, and methods of analysis
| Outcomes of Interest | N (out of 44) | % |
|---|---|---|
| Study design | ||
| Prospective | 10 | 23 |
| Retrospective | 31 | 70 |
| Unclear | 3 | 7 |
| Clearly defined end of study | ||
| Yes | 34 | 77 |
| No | 10 | 23 |
| Comparison of those with and without full follow-up among studies with a clearly defined end of follow-up | (out of 34) | |
| Yes | 5 | 15 |
| No | 24 | 71 |
| Not Applicable (all participants had full follow-up) | 5 | 15 |
| Method of analysis | ||
| Linear or logistic regression | 8 | 18 |
| Gaussian process regression | 1 | 2 |
| Repeated measures | 11 | 25 |
| Mixed model or generalized mixed model | 20 | 45 |
| GEE | 3 | 7 |
| IIW-GEE | 1 | 2 |
| Reported summary statistics on | ||
| Number of visits per patient | 25 | 57 |
| Gaps between visits per patient | 3 | 7 |
| Follow-up time per patient | 25 | 57 |
| Predictors of visit time assessed | ||
| Yes | 2 | 5 |
| No | 41 | 93 |
| Unclear | 1 | 2 |
| Was there a need to account for informative visit times? | ||
| Yes | 6 | 14 |
| of which | ||
| Analysis specifically designed to check for informativeness | 1 (out of 6) | 18 |
| Informativeness inferred by reviewers | 5 (out of 6) | 82 |
| Unclear | 38 | 86 |
| Method used to account for informative visit times for studies with sufficient reporting of an identifiable need | (out of 6) | |
| Yes | 1 | 19 |
| No | 5 | 81 |