Abstract
A concise approach to synthesize the 5-7-6 tricyclic carbon skeleton of the daphnane/tigliane diterpene natural products has been accomplished via a sequential gold-catalyzed furan formation and furan-allene [4+3] cycloaddition. This work provides new avenues for rapid and diverted synthesis of the medicinally important daphnane/tigliane diterpenes and their unnatural analogues.
Keywords: Daphnane/Tigliane, Diterpene, Gold catalysis, Furan formation, [4+3] cycloaddition
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction
The daphnanes and tiglianes, isolated from thymelaeaceae and euphorbiaceae, are two large groups of structurally diverse diterpene natural products which share a characteristic 5-7-6 tricyclic carbon skeleton.[1] These structurally complex molecules have received a significant amount of attention due to their appealing chemical structures and promising therapeutic potential. They have demonstrated a broad range of biological activities, including anticancer, antiviral, analgesic, and neurotrophic effects.[1b,2] For example, kirkinine[3] (1, Figure 1), isolated from the roots of synaptolepis kirkii, is the most potent neurotrophically active natural product reported so far. It effectively promotes neuronal survival against serum deprivation in nanomolar concentrations, which is comparable to the nerve growth factor itself. Phorbol (2)[4] is a well-known tumor promotor and protein kinase C activator. On the other hand, phorbol 12-myristate-13 acetate, also a protein kinase C activator, has been advanced into human clinical trials for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia. Prostratin (3) [5], is a promising therapeutic agent that targets latent HIV reservoirs. Resiniferatoxin (4)[6] exhibits an analgesic effect through activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), which induces desensitization of nociceptive neurons.
Figure 1.
Representative daphanane/tigliane diterpenes
The structural complexity and promising therapeutic applications of these daphnane and tigliane diterpenes have identified themselves as attractive synthetic targets. Many synthetic approaches toward the core structures of these natural products have been reported since the early 1980s.[7] These synthetic efforts cultimated in the total syntheses of phorbol and resiniferatoxin by Wender[8] and co-workers, a formal synthesis of phorbol by Cha[9] et al., a total synthesis of crotophorbolone, a derivative of the daphnane/tigliane diterpenes, by the Inoue[10] group, and an impressive 19-step total synthesis of phorbol by the Baran group[11] (Figure 2). The Wender synthesis features a [5+2] cycloaddition to construct the 6,7-fused bicycle. The Cha synthesis utilized a [4+3] cycloaddition to build the central 7-membered ring and the Inoue group used a radical cyclization to close the 7-membered ring. An allene-alkene Pauson-Khand reaction[12] was employed by the Baran group to set up the 5,7-fused ring system.
Figure 2.
Selected strategies for daphanane/tigliane synthesis
Despite all these synthetic efforts, concise and highly efficient synthetic routes toward these complex diterpenes are still valuable and necessary. Herein, we report our efforts in developing a synthetic approach to rapidly construct the 5-7-6 carbotricyclic ring system by using a gold-catalyzed furan formation and furan/allene [4+3] cycloaddition.
Gold catalysis has started to play an important role in facilitating total syntheses of complex bioactive natural products.[13] The gold-catalyzed furan/allene [4+3] cycloaddition, developed by the groups of Mascareñas[14] and Toste[15], is a very efficient synthetic method for highly functionalized 7-membered ring construction. Despite the high efficiency in constructing polycyclic ring systems, its application in complex natural product synthesis has been very rare.[16] Meanwhile, a number of gold-catalyzed furan formation reactions[17] were reported to access highly substituted furan moieties. Inspired by these works, we envisoned a gold-catalyzed tandem furan formation followed by furan/allene [4+3] cycloaddition as an efficient approach for the synthesis of the daphanane/tigliane 5-7-6 core skeleton (Figure 3, 6→10). This tandem process would start from relatively simple enyne alcohol 6, which could be readily assembled by a Sonogashira cross coupling. The gold catalyst would selectively activate the alkyne to trigger a 5-exo-dig cyclization of the hydroxyl group on the alkyne and generate hydrofuran 7, which would then isomerize to furan 8. The gold catalyst would then activate the allene to generate an allylic cation-gold complex for the [4+3] cycloaddition to provide product 10, which could then be advanced to the daphnane/tigliane diterpenes. This tandem process faces several challenges: (i) How to preferentially activate the alkyne in presence of the allene? (ii) How to avoid other competing cycloisomerization reactions before the furan formation and [4+3] cycloaddition? (iii) Will the reaction provide the desired stereochemistry? Despite these potential problems, such a tandem process would significantly improve synthetic efficiency by converting relatively simple and readily available starting material such as 6 to complex polycyclic intermediate such as 10, which resembles the core skeleton of the daphnane/tigliane diterpene natural products.
Figure 3.
Proposed synthesis of the daphanane/tigliane 5-7-6 tricyclic ring system via tandem gold catalysis
2. Result and discussion
We designed substrates 6a–6c with varying substituents on the allene moiety as our model substrates. Their syntheses are summarized in Scheme 1. Fragment 13 is a known compound[18] which can be synthesized on gram scale in 66% yield through a Vilsmeier-Haack reaction of cyclopentanone 11 followed by a sodium borohydride reduction of the resulting aldehyde 12. Allenes 17a–17c were synthesized utilizing the Ma’s protocol for allene synthesis[19] followed by propargylation. Sonogashira cross coupling united 13 and 17 successfully and gave the desired coupling products from 52% to 86% yield. In these Sonogashira couplings, the freeze-pump-thaw[20] technique is crucial for high yields; otherwise, a significant amount of alkyne dimerization leads to a dramatic drop of the reaction yield.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of model substrates 6a–6c
We next investigated the feasibility of the gold-catalyzed tandem cyclization and cycloaddition process under various reaction conditions on substrate 6a (Table 1). Initially, the commonly used gold catalyst systems reported for the [4+3] cycloadditions were tested. To our disappiontment, conditions such as PPh3AuNTf2 (entries 1 and 4), tBuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6 (entry 2), and IPrAuCl/AgSbF6 (entry 3) only gave very complex mixtures, indicating that these highly reactive catalyst systems may be promoting unwanted cycloisomerization pathways instead of the first furan formation step. The combination of PPh3AuCl/AgOTf in THF was able to produce furan product 8a in good yield (65% to 72%), but it failed to promote the second [4+3] cycloaddition step (entry 6). Interestingly, the furan formation reaction became unproductive by simply changing solvent from THF to DCE (entry 5) or adding molecular sieves (entry 7) or NaHCO3 (entry 8).
Table 1.
Condition optimization for the tandem process
| ||
|---|---|---|
| entry | condition | result |
| 1 | 10% PPh3AuNTf2, toluene, 60–70 °C | complex mixture |
| 2 | 10% tBuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6, DCE, −20 °C to RT | decomposed |
| 3 | 10% IPrAuCl/AgSbF6, DCM, RT. | complex mixture |
| 4 | 10% PPh3AuNTf2, DCM, 0 °C | 8a, 30% brsm (60% con.) |
| 5 | 10% PPh3AuCl/AgOTf, DCE, RT | complex mixture |
| 6 | 10% PPh3AuCl/AgOTf, THF, RT | 8a, 65% to 72% |
| 7 | 10% PPh3AuCl/AgOTf, THF, RT, 4Å MS | no reaction |
| 8 | 10% PPh3AuCl/AgOTf, THF, RT, NaHCO3 | very low conversion |
After unfruitful efforts in realizing a tandem gold-catalyzed furan formation and furan-allene [4+3] cycloaddition by using one gold catalyst system, we decided to run the [4+3] cycloaddition separately and a number of catalysts, silver salts and solvents were evaluated (Table 2). The IPrAuCl/AgSbF6 combination was effective to catalyze the [4+3] cycloaddition and the cycloaddition product was obtained as a 1.4:1 (10a:10a′) mixture of isomers in 35% total yield. Molecular sieves were found to be benefical for the cycloaddition (entry 2), while coordinating solvents such as CH3CN (entry 3) and THF (entry 4 and 8) inhibited the reaction process. PtCl2/CO was also ineffective (entry 5). While DPPM(AuCl)2/AgSbF6 gave no product at room temperature, the combination of tBuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6 in DCE at 60 °C gave the best yield so far and products 10a and 10a′ were obtained in 74% yield, again as 1.4:1 mixture. Overall, electron-rich and bulky ligand-gold catalyst systems are critical for this transformation. Efforts to realize a one-pot furan formation and furan-allene [4+3] cycloaddition of 8a by using two different gold catalyst systems have not be successful so far.
Table 2.
Condition optimization for the [4+3] cycloaddition
| ||
|---|---|---|
| entry | condition | result |
| 1 | 20% IPrAuCl/AgSbF6, DCM, RT | 10a:10a′ = 1.4: 1 (35%) |
| 2 | 20% IPrAuCl/AgSbF6, DCE, RT, 4Å MS | 10a:10a′ = 1.4: 1 (50%) |
| 3 | 20% IPrAuCl/AgSbF6, CH3CN, RT, 4Å MS | No reaction |
| 4 | 20% IPrAuCl/AgSbF6, THF, RT, 4Å MS | trace |
| 5 | 20% PtCl2/CO,PhMe, reflux | complex mixture |
| 6 | 10% DPPM(AuCl)2/AgSbF6, DCE, RT, 4Å MS | No reaction |
| 7 | 10% tBuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6, DCE, 60 °C 4Å MS | 10a:10a′ = 1.4: 1 (74%) |
| 8 | 10% t BuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6, THF, 60 °C 4Å MS | no reaction |
Since the ratio for desired product (10a) and the double bond isomerized product (10a′) is unsatisfactory and can not be tuned by changing the catalyst system, we then investigated the substituent effect on the allene moiety and wondered how different substituent groups might affect this selectivity. Substrates 6b (R = H) and 6c (R = CH2OBn) were evaluated (Scheme 2). Both 6b and 6c underwent the furan formation reaction smoothly and products 8b and 8c were produced in 68% and 63% yields, respectively. While 8b turned out to be a poor substrate for the gold-catalyzed [4+3] cycloaddition reaction, 8c did gave cycloaddition products in 60% and a slight ratio increase of the desired product 10c and the double bond isomerized product 10c′ was observed under the tBuXPhosAuCl/AgSbF6 conditions. This result indicates the possibility of improving the selectivity by tuning the electronic properties of the substituent on the allene part.
Scheme 2.
Gold-catalyzed furan formation and [4+3] cycloaddition of 6b and 6c.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a concise synthetic approach to the core carbon skeleton of the daphnane/tigliane diterpenes. The key features of this synthetic route include rapid synthesis of the precursor using a Sonogashira coupling reaction and a sequential gold-catalyzed furan formation and furan/allene [4+3] cycloaddition to assemble the 5-7-6 carbotricyclic ring system. This study demonstrates that the gold-catalyzed [4 + 3] cycloaddition of furan/allene can be applied to the construction of a complex oxabridged polycyclic system in a stereoselective manner. Further syntheses of daphnane/tigliane and related diterpene natural products as well as their unnatural analogs using this approach are currently in progress and will be reported in due course.
4. Experimental section
4.1. (2-bromocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)methanol(13)
Compound 13 was synthesized by a reported[18] procedure. To a stirred solution of dimethylformamide (11.6 mL, 150 mmol) in 45 mL dichloromethane, phosphorus tribromide (11.8 mL, 125 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The suspension was stirred for an additional 1 hour before a solution of cyclopentanone (4.5 mL, 50 mmol) in 20 mL dichloromethane was added slowly. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight before the addition of a saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give the crude product as a light yellow liquid, which was used for the next step directly.
To a solution of the above crude product in 45 mL methanol, sodium borohydride (1.9 g, 50 mmol) was added portionwise at 0 °C. After 1 hour, saturated ammonium chloride aqueous solution was added to quench the reaction. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 6:1) to give the compound 3 (5.95 g, 66%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.25 (s, 2H), 2.74 – 2.62 (m, 2H), 2.52 – 2.39 (m, 2H), 2.02 – 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.69 – 1.45 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 139.7, 118.2, 60.6, 40.4, 32.6, 21.8; IR (neat): ν = 3313, 2951, 2852, 1655, 1443, 1319, 1245, 1091, 1023, 1002, 959, 894, 697 cm−1.
4.2. dimethyl 2-(5-(benzyloxy)penta-2,3-dien-1-yl)malonate (16c)
To a solution of dimethyl 2-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)malonate (1.7 g, 10.0 mmol) in 100 mL dioxane, diisopropylamine (3.48 mL, 25 mmol), copper iodide (950 mg, 5 mmol) and 2-(benzyloxy)acetaldehyde (3.75 mL, 25 mmol) were added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was warmed to 100 °C and stirred for 36 hours. After it was cooled down and quenched with saturated solution of ammonium chloride (100 mL), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×100 mL), and the combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified twice by flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 15:1; hexane/DCM = 1:1 to DCM/ethyl acetate = 10:1) on silica gel to afford product 16c (900 mg, 23%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 5.44 – 5.18 (m, 2H), 4.52 (s, 2H), 4.01 (pt, J = 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.51 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (ddd, J = 7.5, 6.5, 3.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 205.1, 169.3, 138.2, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 90.5, 88.7, 72.0, 68.2, 52.7, 51.3, 27.8; IR (neat): ν = 2953, 2857, 1755, 1736, 1441, 1346, 1269, 1233, 1154, 1097, 1071, 740, 700 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C17H21O5 [M+H]+ 305.1384, found 305.1390 m/z.
4.3. dimethyl 2-(5-(benzyloxy)penta-2,3-dien-1-yl)-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)malonate (17c)
To a solution of compound 16c (390 mg, 1.28 mmol) in 10 mL dimethylformamide, sodium hydride (77 mg, 1.92 mmol) was added at 0 °C. The suspension was stirred for 30 mins before propargyl bromide (0.2 mL, 80% solution in toluene, 1.5 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for overnight. After the reaction was quenched with saturated solution of ammonium chloride (10 mL), the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL), and the combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 15:1) on silica gel to afford product 17c (300 mg, 70%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 5.39 – 5.23 (m, 1H), 5.10 – 5.03 (m, 1H), 4.52 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 2H), 4.04 (dt, J = 6.9, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.87 (dd, J = 2.8, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 2.02 – 1.96 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 206.8, 170.1, 138.2, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 88.9, 85.7, 78.7, 72.0, 71.7, 68.3, 57.2, 53.0, 32.1, 22.8; IR (neat): ν = 3288, 2953, 1736, 1438, 1293, 1209, 1074, 940, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C20H23O5 [M+H]+ 343.1540, found 343.1546 m/z.
4.4. dimethyl 2-(5-(benzyloxy)penta-2,3-dien-1-yl)-2-(3-(2-(hydroxymethyl)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)malonate (6c)
A mixture of compound 13 (140 mg, 0.8 mmol), compound 17c (300 mg, 0.88 mmol), (PPh3)2PdCl2 (28 mg, 0.04 mmol), copper iodide (15 mg, 0.08 mmol) and diisopropylamine (8 mL) was degassed via five freeze-pump-thaw cycles before it was warmed to 70 °C and stirred overnight. After the reaction was quenched with saturated solution of ammonium chloride, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 5:1 to 2:1) on silica gel to afford product 6c (180 mg, 52%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.41 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 5.41 – 5.25 (m, 1H), 5.12 – 4.96 (m, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 4.40 – 4.17 (m, 2H), 4.02 (dt, J = 7.1, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.02 (s, 2H), 2.81 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.2 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (ddd, J = 9.9, 5.5, 2.1 Hz, 4H), 1.91 – 1.80 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 206.9, 170.3, 149.7, 138.1, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 119.8, 89.0, 88.8, 85.8, 79.7, 72.1, 68.4, 60.7, 57.4, 53.0, 37.2, 34.0, 32.4, 24.1, 22.4; IR (neat): ν = 3441, 2957, 2922, 2849, 1737, 1439, 1291, 1210, 1079, 996, 740, 698 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C26H31O6 [M+H]+ 439.2115, found 439.2100 m/z.
4.5. dimethyl 2-(5-(benzyloxy)penta-2,3-dien-1-yl)-2-(2-(5,6-dihydro-4H-cyclopenta[c]furan-1-yl)ethyl)malonate(8c)
To a stirred mixture of chloro(triphenylphosphine)gold(I) (9.5 mg, 0.02 mmol) and silver trifluoromethanesulfonate (5 mg, 0.02 mmol) in THF (0.5 mL), a solution of compound 6c (84 mg, 0.2 mmol) in 1 mL THF was added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 hour at room temperature before it was quenched with saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 20:1 to 6:1) on silica gel to afford product 8c (53 mg, 64%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 6.90 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (tdd, J = 6.6, 4.4, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (tdt, J = 8.2, 6.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.02 (ddd, J = 7.0, 2.3, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.68 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 2.58 – 2.46 (m, 6H), 2.34 – 2.24 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 206.6, 171.3, 143.9, 138.2, 133.5, 130.9, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 88.8, 86.1, 72.0, 68.3, 57.4, 52.7, 32.6, 32.4, 30.4, 23.5, 23.4, 22.6; IR (neat): ν = 2950, 2857, 1735, 1449, 1275, 1241, 1204, 1182, 1091, 746, 702 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C26H31O6 [M+H]+ 439.2115, found 439.2114 m/z.
4.6. dimethyl (4R,6aR,10aR)-5-((benzyloxy)methyl)-1,2,3,4,6a,7,9,10-octahydro-8H-4,10a-epoxybenzo[e]azulene-8,8-dicarboxylate(10c) and dimethyl (4S,5R,10aR)-5-((benzyloxy)methyl)-1,2,3,4,5,7,9,10-octahydro-8H-4,10a-epoxybenzo[e]azulene-8,8-dicarboxylate (10c′)
To a suspension of activated 4 Å molecular sieves (30 mg) in 0.5 mL dichloroethene in 8 mL vial, chloro[2-di-tert-butyl(2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl)phosphine]gold(I) (5 mg, 0.01 mmol) and silver hexafluoroantimonate(V) (2.4 mg, 0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 minutes at room temperature before substrate 8c (34 mg, 0.078 mmol) in 0.5 mL dichloroethene was added. The reaction mixture was then warmed to 60 °C and stirred for 5 hours. After the reaction was quenched with saturated solution of ammonium chloride, the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate and the combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography twice (hexane/ethyl acetate = 10:1; dichloromethane/ethyl acetate = 50:1) on silica gel to afford product 10c (13 mg, 39%) and 10c′ (7 mg, 21%) as colorless oil. 10c: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 5.33 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (s, 1H), 4.48 (q, J = 11.9 Hz, 2H), 3.92 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.40 (ddt, J = 14.1, 7.8, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 2.31 – 2.18 (m, 5H), 2.12 – 1.94 (m, 3H), 1.86 (dddd, J = 23.8, 19.0, 11.1, 3.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.3, 171.4, 157.7, 146.4, 140.7, 138.2, 128.5, 127.8, 127.7, 126.5, 80.8, 72.1, 71.4, 55.0, 52.9, 52.7, 33.7, 32.1, 29.4, 29.0, 27.7, 26.3, 26.1; IR (neat): ν = 2951, 2850, 1732, 1454, 1435, 1237, 1176, 1077, 1028, 986, 867, 739, 699 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C26H31O6 [M+H]+ 439.2115, found 439.2110 m/z. 10c′: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39 – 7.27 (m, 5H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.52 – 4.42 (m, 2H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.26 (dd, J = 8.7, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.20 – 3.12 (m, 1H), 3.11 – 3.05 (m, 1H), 2.95 (dd, J = 15.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.52 – 2.38 (m, 4H), 2.38 – 2.30 (m, 1H), 2.30 – 2.22 (m, 2H), 2.04 – 1.85 (m, 3H), 1.77 – 1.70 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.3, 170.5, 159.0, 143.8, 140.1, 138.1, 128.5, 127.8, 118.7, 80.7, 77.8, 73.4, 70.1, 54.7, 53.0, 52.8, 38.3, 37.2, 29.6, 29.1, 28.7, 27.7, 27.3; IR (neat): ν = 2952, 2850, 1735, 1451, 1307, 1250, 1163, 1098, 1073, 1014, 992, 895, 744, 700 cm−1; HRMS (ESI): calcd for C26H31O6 [M+H]+ 439.2115, found 439.2108 m/z.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the NIH P30CA023168 for supporting shared NMR resources to Purdue Center for Cancer Research and Purdue University for Startup Support. MW thanks the Tsinghua Xuetang Program for finantial support.
Footnotes
Supplementary material that may be helpful in the review process should be prepared and provided as a separate electronic file. That file can then be transformed into PDF format and submitted along with the manuscript and graphic files to the appropriate editorial office.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and notes
- 1.(a) Liao S-G, Chen H-D, Yue J-M. Chem Rev. 2009;109:1092–1140. doi: 10.1021/cr0782832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang HB, Wang XY, Liu LP, Qin GW, Kang TG. Chem Rev. 2015;115:2975–3011. doi: 10.1021/cr200397n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Borris RP, Blasko G, Cordell GA. J Ethnopharmacol. 1988;24:41–91. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(88)90138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.He W, Cik M, Lesage A, Linden IV, Kimpe ND, Appendino G, Bracke J, Mathenge SG, Mudida FP, Leysen JE, Puyvelde LV. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:1185–1187. doi: 10.1021/np000249u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Newton AC. Chem Rev. 2001;101:2353–2364. doi: 10.1021/cr0002801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson HE, Banack SA, Cox PA. J Nat Prod. 2008;71:2041–2044. doi: 10.1021/np800295m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Szallasi A, Blumberg PM. Neuroscience. 1989;30:515–520. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90269-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.For synthetic studies: Hassan AHE, Lee JK, Pae AN, Min SJ, Cho YS. Org Lett. 2015;17:2672–2675. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01054.Tong G, Liu Z, Li P. Org Lett. 2014;16:2288–2291. doi: 10.1021/ol5008263.Catino AJ, Sherlock A, Shieh P, Wzorek JS, Evans DA. Org Lett. 2013;15:3330–3333. doi: 10.1021/ol401367h.Murai K, Katoh S, Urabe D, Inoue M. Chem Sci. 2013;4:2364–2368.Stewart C, McDonald R, West FG. Org Lett. 2011;13:720–723. doi: 10.1021/ol102953s.Ritter T, Zarotti P, Carreira EM. Org Lett. 2004;6:4371–4374. doi: 10.1021/ol0480832.Page PCB, Hayman CM, McFarland HL, Willock DJ, Galea NM. Synlett. 2002:583–587.Chairgulprasert V, Drew MGB, Jahans A, Harwood LM. ARKIVOC. 2002;(ix):37–45.Jackson SR, Johnson MG, Mikami M, Shiokawa S, Carreira EM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2001;40:2694–2697.Drew MGB, Harwood LM, Macías-Sánchez AJ, Scott R, Thomas RM, Uguen D. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2001;40:2311–2313. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010618)40:12<2311::AID-ANIE2311>3.0.CO;2-T.Ovaska TV, Reisman SE, Flynn MA. Org Lett. 2001;3:115–117. doi: 10.1021/ol006823a.Carroll GL, Little RD. Org Lett. 2000;2:2873–2876. doi: 10.1021/ol006301v.Sekine A, Kumagai N, Uotsu K, Ohshima T, Shibasaki M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:509–513.Sato H, Kim YS, Shibasaki M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:2973–2976.Eckert JM. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, MA: 1997. Efforts toward the total syntheses of phorbol and CP-225917.Page PCB, Jennens DC, Farland HM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:5395–5398.Page PCB, Jennens DC, Farland HM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:6913–6916.Sugita K, Neville CF, Sodeoka M, Sasai H, Shibasaki M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:1067–1070.Paquette LA, Sauer DR, Edmondson SD, Friedrich D. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:4071–4086.McMills MC, Zhuang L, Wright DL, Watt W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:8311–8314.Dauben WG, Dinges J, Smith TC. J Org Chem. 1993;58:7635–7637.Magar SS, Desai RC, Fuchs PL. J Org Chem. 1992;57:5360–5369.Shigeno K, Ohne K, Yamaguchi T, Sasai H, Shibasaki M. Heterocycles. 1992;33:161–171.Shigeno K, Sasai H, Shibasaki M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:4937–4940.Page PCB, Jennens DC. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1992:2587–2589.Page PCB, Jennens DC, Porter RA, Baldock AN. Synlett. 1991:472–474.Harwood LM, Ishikawa T, Phillips H, Watkin D. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1991:527–530.Wender PA, Mascareñas JL. J Org Chem. 1991;56:6267–6269.Wender PA, McDonald FE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:3691–3694.Rigby JH, Kierkus PC. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:4125–4126.Rigby JH, Kierkus PC, Head D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989;30:5073–5076.Wender PA, Keenan RM, Lee HY. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:4390–4392.Burrell SJ, Derome AE, Edenborough MS, Harwood LM, Leeming SA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:2229–2232.Wender PA, Hillman CL, Szymonifka MJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980;21:2205–2208.
- 8.(a) Wender PA, Jesudason CD, Nakahira H, Tamura N, Tebbe AL, Ueno Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:12976–12977. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wender PA, Rice KD, Schnute ME. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:7897–7898. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wender PA, Buschmann N, Cardin NB, Jones LR, Kan C, Kee JM, Kowalski JA, Longcore KE. Nat Chem. 2011;3:615–619. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wender PA, Kogen H, Lee HY, Munger JD, Jr, Wilhelm RS, Williams PD. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:8957–8958. [Google Scholar]; (e) Wender PA, Kogen H, Lee HY, Munger JD, Wilhelm RS, Williams PD. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:8954–8957. [Google Scholar]; (f) Wender PA, McDonald FE. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:4956–4958. [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Lee K, Cha JK. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:5590–5591. doi: 10.1021/ja010643u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lee K, Cha JK. Org Lett. 1999;1:523–526. doi: 10.1021/ol990709e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Asaba T, Katoh Y, Urabe D, Inoue M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:14457–14461. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kawamura S, Chu H, Felding J, Baran PS. Nature. 2016;532:90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature17153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brummond KM, Chen H, Fisher KD, Kerekes AD, Rickards B, Sill PC, Geib SJ. Org Lett. 2002;4:1931–1934. doi: 10.1021/ol025955w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Gorin DJ, Toste FD. Nature. 2007;446:395–403. doi: 10.1038/nature05592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang Y, Luo T, Yang Z. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:489–503. doi: 10.1039/c3np70075e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dorel R, Echavarren AM. Chem Rev. 2015;115:9028–9072. doi: 10.1021/cr500691k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Pflästerer D, Hashmi ASK. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:1331–1367. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00721f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Trillo B, López F, Gulías M, Castedo L, Mascareñas JL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:951–954. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Trillo B, López F, Montserrat S, Ujaque G, Castedo L, Lledós A, Mascareñas JL. Chem Eur J. 2009;15:3336–3339. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) López F, Mascareñas JL. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:2904–2915. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00024b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mauleón P, Zeldin RM, González AZ, Toste FD. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:6348–6349. doi: 10.1021/ja901649s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Gung BW, Craft DT. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:2685–2687. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gung BW, Craft DT, Baily LN, Kirschbaum K. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:639–644. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nelson R, Gulías M, Mascareñas JL, López F. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016 doi: 10.1002/anie.201607348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.For a review: Corma A, Leyva-Pérez A, Sabater MJ. Chem Rev. 2011;111:1657–1712. doi: 10.1021/cr100414u.For examples: Zhang Y, Xin ZJ, Xue JJ, Li Y. Chin J Chem. 2008;26:1461–1464.Aponick A, Li CY, Malinge J, Marques EF. Org Lett. 2009;11:4624–4627. doi: 10.1021/ol901901m.Kim S, Kang D, Shin S, Lee PH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:1899–1901.Egi M, Azechi K, Akai S. Org Lett. 2009;11:5002–5005. doi: 10.1021/ol901942t.Praveen C, Kiruthiga P, Perumal PT. Synlett. 2009:1990–1996.
- 18.Rajamannar T, Balasubramanian KK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988;29:5789–5792. [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Kuang J, Ma S. J Org Chem. 2009;74:1763–1765. doi: 10.1021/jo802391x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ma S, Hou H, Zhao S, Wang G. Synthesis. 2002:1643–1645. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu F, Negishi E. J Org Chem. 1997;62:8591–8594. doi: 10.1021/jo971360g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





