Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 7;11(4):791–799. doi: 10.1177/1932296816681584

Table 5.

FP and FN Cases of Phenotyping Algorithms.

Patterns of cases (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (D) (G)
FP Temporary glycemia 5 0 5 17 0 0 3
Secondary DM 5 0 1 0 0 0 2
T1DM 2 1 0 1 0 1 0
Non-T2DM (except above cases) 13 0 4 0 2 0 17
FN Regarded as T1DM 0 0 0 0 0 2 (one case overlaps case with T2DM and T1DM) 4
No E11x (T2DM) ICD-10 code 1 11 1 0 1 3 2
Regarded as temporary hyperglycemia 0 0 0 0 1 10 0
No abnormal lab owing to good control of T2DM 0 3 0 4 1 4 3
No test of HbA1c and glycoalbumin 0 2 0 0 0 1 1
No glucose test 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Treated with exercise or diet therapy 0 14 0 0 0 5 0
No T2DM medication (treated in other hospitals) 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
Others 9 11 0 0 0 0 0

Some overlapping cases exist between patterns in FN cases of proposed algorithm (B). Nine FN cases of algorithms (A) or (B) were classified as non-T2DM by the rule in the first step.