Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2017 Aug 1;48(9):2353–2360. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017357

Table 4.

Relationship between the presence of cortical, cerebellar, and subcortical infarcts and incident dementia

Infarcts vs. no infarcts
Infarct region/infarct groups: Incident dementia (n=358) Without dementia (n=2254) Risk-ratio (95%CI)
Cortical
No prevalent & no incident 267 1928 Reference
One or more prevalent & no incident 39 175 1.3 (1.0–1.7)
No prevalent & one or more incident 32 97 1.7 (1.3–2.2)
One or more prevalent & one or more incident 20 54 1.5 (1.00–2.2)
Cerebellar
No prevalent & no incident 234 1643 Reference
One or more prevalent & no incident 50 345 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
No prevalent & one or more incident 39 155 1.2 (0.9–1.6)
One or more prevalent & one or more incident 35 111 1.5 (1.1–2.1)
Subcortical
No prevalent & no incident 290 2050 Reference
One or more prevalent & no incident 27 129 1.2 (0.8–1.6)
No prevalent & one or more incident 32 48 2.6 (1.9–3.4)
One or more prevalent & one or more incident 9 27 1.9 (1.1–3.3)

Values show number of subjects with infarcts in the various regions versus those with no infarcts in corresponding regions in the groups of subjects with and without incident dementia together with the risk-ratios of incident dementia by infarct group. Risk-ratios are with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) adjusted for baseline age, sex, time interval between MRI scans.