Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul 8;114(4):416–422. doi: 10.1002/jso.24364

Table V. Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Studies Utilizing the BREAST-Q.

Reference Patient Base Number of patients Breast-Q Done Preoperatively (y/n) Breast-Q Postop Time point(s) Scales Preoperative Score Postop Score
Howard 2016 Nipple Sparing Mastectomy 48 y 2 years Satisfaction with breasts 63 73
Psychosocial well-being 70 86
Physical well-being 85 77
Sexual well-being 57 57
Satisfaction with outcome n/a 75
Peled 2014 Total Skin Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander-Implant Reconstruction 28 y 3, 6, 12 months Satisfaction with breasts 69.8 67.8
Psychosocial well-being 75.7 74.9
Physical well-being 84.3 72.5
Sexual well-being 58.3 57.7
Satisfaction with outcome n/a 68.1
Jeeven 2014 Breast recon +/- immediate recon or delayed reconstruction 7,110 n 3-mo, 18 mo Satisfaction with breasts 55
Psychosocial well-being 65
Physical well-being 75
Sexual well-being 46
McCarthy 2010 Silicone implant subset 176 gel patients n 2.4 years* Satisfaction with breasts 58.9
Salgarello 2012 Subset of immediate recon patients 12 n “during reconstruction” Satisfaction with breasts 62.8
Psychosocial well-being 63.3
Physical well-being 35.1
Sexual well-being 64
Satisfaction with outcome 65.8
No CPM CPM
Koslow 2013 Subset of immediate implant-based recon in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM)vs no CPM studyγ 294 n 4.3 years post-mastectomy Satisfaction with breasts 54.9 64.4
Psychosocial well-being 72.3 75.4
Physical well-being 75 77.4
Sexual well-being 52.3 55.1
Satisfaction with outcome 67.7 74.8
Sugrue 2013 Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy 33 y, done retrospectively Not defined Satisfaction with breasts 66 64
Psychosocial well-being 67 69
Physical well-being 81 81
Sexual well-being 52 54
Satisfaction with outcome n/a Not reported
SSM NSM
Metcalfe 2015 Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (skin-sparing (SSM) versus nipple-sparing (NSM)) δ 137 n 50 months* Satisfaction with breasts 62 71
Psychosocial well-being 76 82
Sexual well-being 49 72
Satisfaction with outcome 75 100
*

mean

γ

Breast-Q reported as CPM versus No CPM

δ

Breast-Q reported as SSM versus NPM