Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;7(9):e016833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833

Table 2.

Results of meta-analysis by using different methods of dichotomising volume groups

Lowest volume group vs all others Even dichotomy, middle group as HV Even dichotomy,
middle group as LV
(primary analysis)
Highest volume group vs all others
Mortality
Radical nephrectomy OR: 0.82
95% CI 0.71 to 0.94, p=0.01
OR: 0.83
95% CI 0.72 to 0.95, p<0.01
OR: 0.74
95% CI 0.61 to 0.90, p<0.01
OR: 0.72
95% CI 0.61 to 0.85, p<0.01
Partial nephrectomy OR: 0.48
95% CI 0.18 to 1.31, p=0.15
OR: 0.67
95% CI 0.17 to 2.75, p=0.58
OR: 0.84
95% CI 0.31 to 2.26, p=0.73
OR: 0.93
95% CI 0.31 to 2.77, p=0.90
Nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy OR: 0.59
95% CI 0.35 to 0.99, p=0.045
OR: 0.46
95% CI 0.27 to 0.80, p<0.01
OR: 0.48
95% CI 0.29 to 0.81, p=0.01
OR: 0.48
95% CI 0.25 to 0.92, p=0.03
Complications
Radical nephrectomy OR: 0.89
95% CI 0.78 to 1.01, p=0.07
OR: 0.84
95% CI 0.68 to 1.05, p=0.13
OR: 0.82
95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, p<0.01
OR: 0.82
95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, p<0.01
Partial nephrectomy OR: 0.82
95% CI 0.55 to 1.41, p=0.60
OR: 0.80
95% CI 0.47 to 1.36, p=0.40
OR: 0.85
95% CI 0.55 to 1.30, p=0.44
OR: 0.81
95% CI 0.53 to 1.24, p=0.33

HV, high volume; LV, low volume.