Table 4. Expert survey results on threat sensitivity based on the consensus approach.
| Species | Threat | Weighted Score | Number of Experts | Average Concordance Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overexploitation | 3.68 | 14 | 0.47 | |
| Acacia macrostachya Rchb. ex DC. | Overgrazing | 2.33 | ||
| Fire | 2.94 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.93 | 15 | 0.54 | |
| Acacia senegal (L.) Willd | Overgrazing | 3.73 | ||
| Fire | 2.87 | |||
| Overexploitation | 4.2 | 14 | 0.55 | |
| Adansonia digitata L. | Overgrazing | 2.17 | ||
| Fire | 2.43 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.47 | 14 | 0.76 | |
| Annona senegalensis Pers. | Overgrazing | 1.66 | ||
| Fire | 3.03 | |||
| Overexploitation | 3.29 | 13 | 0.49 | |
| Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Delile | Overgrazing | 3.8 | ||
| Fire | 2.31 | |||
| Overexploitation | 4.55 | 14 | 0.63 | |
| Bombax costatum Pellegr. & Vuill. | Overgrazing | 2.13 | ||
| Fire | 2.8 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.82 | 14 | 0.54 | |
| Boscia senegalensis (Pers.) Lam. | Overgrazing | 2.57 | ||
| Fire | 2.43 | |||
| Overexploitation | 3.75 | 14 | 0.63 | |
| Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr. | Overgrazing | 1.57 | ||
| Fire | 3.06 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.93 | 12 | 0.65 | |
| Lannea microcarpa Engl. & K. Krause | Overgrazing | 2.07 | ||
| Fire | 2.85 | |||
| Overexploitation | 4.16 | 14 | 0.76 | |
| Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) G. Don | Overgrazing | 1.92 | ||
| Fire | 3.07 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.8 | 12 | 0.33 | |
| Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. | Overgrazing | 1.89 | ||
| Fire | 2.18 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.19 | 13 | 0.56 | |
| Strychnos spinosa Lam. | Overgrazing | 1.91 | ||
| Fire | 3.08 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.98 | 13 | 0.65 | |
| Tamarindus indica L. | Overgrazing | 1.67 | ||
| Fire | 3.02 | |||
| Overexploitation | 4.16 | 14 | 0.71 | |
| Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Gaertn. | Overgrazing | 2.02 | ||
| Fire | 2.77 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.13 | 14 | 0.77 | |
| Ximenia americana L. | Overgrazing | 1.54 | ||
| Fire | 2.88 | |||
| Overexploitation | 2.07 | 14 | 0.50 | |
| Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. | Overgrazing | 2.84 | ||
| Fire | 3.26 |
The greatest threat for each species, marked in bold, is selected based on the highest weighted score. Weighted score values can vary between 1 and 5. The table further shows the number of valid expert responses (number of experts) and the average expert concordance (average concordance value) per species.