Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Timing Time Percept. 2013;1(1):21–38. doi: 10.1163/22134468-00002003

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Normalized mean response rate functions in CHL1 deficient mice (KO) and wild-type controls (WT) in the peak-interval procedure with gaps, when timing the presence (Standard condition) or absence (Reversed condition) of a visual cue. First row: PI trials. Lower 4 rows: Gap trials, with 2-s gaps (left), 5-s gaps (center) and 10-s gaps (right) in the Standard (upper 2 rows) and Reversed condition (bottom 2 rows).