Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 24;8(33):55374–55383. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19520

Table 4. PSA-PFS and OS for IDC-P-positive mCRPC patients.

PSA-PFS Univariate analysis Model without therapeutic scheme Model with therapeutic scheme
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
CFS (mo), ≥ 10 vs. < 10 0.55 (0.26–1.17) 0.119 0.72 (0.32–1.62) 0.432 0.52 (0.21–1.25) 0.144
Gleason score, ≥ 8 vs. < 8 1.72 (0.40–7.34) 0.466 2.50 (0.57–11.00) 0.226 1.76 (0.38–8.09) 0.467
Therapeutic scheme, Abi vs. Doc 0.40 (0.19–0.84) 0.015 0.33 (0.14–0.79) 0.013
ECOG score, ≥ 2 vs. < 2 1.60 (0.71–3.62) 0.259 2.16 (0.92–5.04) 0.076 2.00 (0.81–4.91) 0.132
ALP (IU/L), ≥ 160 vs < 160 2.97 (1.36–6.49) 0.006 2.10 (0.81–5.42) 0.125 2.82 (1.02–7.83) 0.046
LDH (IU/L), ≥ 250 vs < 250 3.20 (1.44–7.13) 0.004 2.63 (1.02–6.79) 0.046 1.68 (0.59–4.77) 0.334
C-index of the model - - 0.719 - 0.778 0.009*
OS Univariate analysis Model without therapeutic scheme Model with therapeutic scheme
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
CFS (mo), ≥ 10 vs. < 10 0.25 (0.09–0.66) 0.005 0.15 (0.04–0.50) 0.002 0.14 (0.04–0.46) 0.001
Gleason score, ≥ 8 vs. < 8 1.03 (0.24–4.45) 0.969 1.50 (0.33–6.86) 0.604 1.20 (0.25–5.79) 0.819
Therapeutic scheme, Abi vs. Doc 0.48 (0.19–1.26) 0.137 0.44 (0.14–1.37) 0.157
ECOG score, ≥ 2 vs. < 2 1.69 (0.64–4.42) 0.288 2.65 (0.89–7.94) 0.081 2.18 (0.71–6.73) 0.174
ALP (IU/L), ≥ 160 vs < 160 4.92 (1.84–13.17) 0.002 2.13 (0.61–7.42) 0.233 3.00 (0.73–12.26) 0.127
LDH (IU/L), ≥ 250 vs < 250 4.87 (1.79–13.26) 0.002 3.37 (0.89–12.79) 0.075 2.37 (0.55–10.34) 0.250
C-index of the model - - 0.829 0.823 0.438*

*c-index test.

OS = overall survival from CRPC to death; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; CFS = CRPC-free survival; IDC-P = intraductal carcinoma of the prostate; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Doc = docetaxel; Abi = abiraterone; ALP = alkaline phosphatase; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase.