Table 1.
Defining characteristics of cluster randomised trials (CRT), non-randomised cluster trials (NCT), controlled before-and-after study (CBA), and before-and-after trials (BA)
| CRT | NCT | CBA | BA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defining features | Randomisation of adequate number of clusters to allow statistical between-arm comparison | Non-random allocation of adequate number of clusters to allow statistical between arm comparison | Random or non-random allocation of small number of clusters - too few to allow statistical between-arm comparison | Before and after assessment of outcomes in the absence of a control group |
| Appropriate setting | Adequate resources, randomisation feasible | Adequate resources, randomisation is politically or logistically not possible | Resource limited evaluations or where number of clusters is naturally constrained (e.g. a district-level intervention in a province that only has 4 districts) | Mass media campaign where no unexposed group can be found |
| Detectable effect size given adequate sample size | Small | Small to moderate (depending on baseline comparability and temporal stability of outcome in control arm) | Moderate to large (depending on baseline comparability and temporal stability of outcome in control arm) | Large |
| Number of clusters | At least 4–6 clusters per arm, higher if effect size is small | At least 4–6 clusters per arm, higher if effect size is small | At least 2 clusters per arm, unless outcome is assessed repeatedly before and after | Study power is determined by number of participants and number of pre/post measures |
| Baseline measure of outcome of interest | Not required, but may increase study power and allow adjusting for imbalances | Required | Required | Required |
| Outcome assessment at multiple time-points | Not required, but may increase study power | Usually not required, but may increase study power | Desirable, required if there is only one cluster per arm | Required |
| Statistical analysis | Direct comparison between intervention and control | Direct comparison between intervention and control, by adjusting for baseline measure of outcome, by calculating change scores or by calculating the difference-in- difference | Comparison before versus after; control arm only serves to demonstrate absence of trends. Analysis of slope and intercept of trends in the outcome measure (if multiple pre/post measures are available) |
Comparison before versus after. Analysis of slope and intercept of trends in the outcome measure (if multiple pre/post measures are available) |
| Special types | Stepped wedge design Trials using systematic allocation (“quasi-randomised”) |
Controlled interrupted time series analysis Per-protocol analysis within a CRT |
Interrupted time series analysis Pre/post adopter versus non-adopter analysis |