Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;2:2333721416665502. doi: 10.1177/2333721416665502

Table 3.

Correlations Between PROMIS Physical Functioning Subscales and IADLS.

Spearman’s ρ correlations
IADLS Scale P Scale F Scale PC Scale FC
IADLS
 Correlation coefficient 1.000 −.539** −.609** −.566** −.505**
 Significance (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
 n 271 240 266 254 266
Scale P
 Correlation coefficient −.539** 1.000 .707** .926** .662**
 Significance (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
 n 240 246 241 242 243
Scale F
 Correlation coefficient −.609** .707** 1.000 .714** .676**
 Significance (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
 n 266 241 271 254 266
Scale PC
 Correlation coefficient −.566** .926** .714** 1.000 .641**
 Significance (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
 n 254 242 254 261 258
Scale FC
 Correlation coefficient −.505** .662** .676** .641** 1.000
 Significance (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
 n 266 243 266 258 272

Note. PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; IADLS = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; P = physical functioning; F = fine motor functioning; PC = physical functioning with cognitive component; FC = fine motor functioning with cognitive component.

**

Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed).