TABLE 7.
Unmet clinical and research needs and knowledge gaps on HCV infection in patients with cancer
| Optimal screening strategy in cancer patients and HCT recipients |
| Value of routine HCV screening in cancer centers |
| Need for systematic cancer screening of HCV-infected cancer patients to identify HCV-related second primary cancers |
| Optimal strategy for monitoring HCV infection during cancer treatment |
| Impact of DAA-based therapy in cancer prevention |
| Most favorable strategy for early detection and treatment of coinfections caused by carcinogenic viruses (e.g., hepatitis B virus, HIV, and human papillomavirus) in HCV-infected cancer patients |
| Studies on HBV reactivation in cancer patients with HBV and HCV co-infection receiving DAAs |
| Optimal timing of antiviral therapy in relation to chemotherapy and HCT |
| Efficacy and safety of various DAA regimens in cancer patients and HCT recipients |
| Predictors of liver disease progression, even if a SVR is achieved |
| Reliability of serologic markers of fibrosis and FibroScan VCTE in predicting the presence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in cancer patients and HCT candidates |
| Inclusion of HCV-infected cancer patients in clinical trials of both cancer treatment and DAAs |
| Virologic, hepatic and oncologic impact of treating HCV in people with various cancers |
| Large well-designed prospective studies focused on cancer patients from distinct geographic areas analyzing the impact of geographic variations of HCV genotypes |
| Characterization of interactions between DAAs and chemotherapeutic agents |
DAA, direct-acting antiviral; HBV, hepatitis B virus ; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant; HCV, hepatitis C virus ; SVR, sustained virologic response; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography