Table 5.
Differences between post-processing methods (PPMs): Detailed analysis
| PPM-pair | P | Slope | Intercept | Outliers | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) ADC_1 vs. ADC_2 | <0.0001 | n.s. | n.s. | 4 | 10.2 |
| (2) ADC_1 vs. ADC_3 | <0.0001 | n.s. | n.s. | 4 | 10.4 |
| (3) ADC_1 vs. ADC_4 | <0.0001 | n.s. | n.s. | 1 | 3.2 |
| (4) ADC_2 vs. ADC_3 | 0.003 | n.s. | n.s. | 1 | 1.1 |
| (5) ADC_2 vs. ADC_4 | <0.0001 | 0.12 | -0.11 | 3 | 9 |
| (6) ADC_3 vs. ADC_4 | <0.0001 | 0.13 | -0.1 | 3 | 9.1 |
Note P value according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test
If there was a significant (P < 0.05) correlation between x (PPM_A) and y (PPM_A minus PPM_B), the slope and intercept of the corresponding regression equation are given. These results indicate a proportional error within PPM-pairs (5) and (6); see also Fig. 5. Accordingly, the difference between ADC_2/ADC_3 and ADC_4 increased with rising ADC-levels
ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, Outliers number of ADC-values beyond +/-1.96 * SD, CV coefficient of variation (%)